Comparative accuracy of 1-hour post-load plasma glucose, glycated albumin, and conventional glycemic measures for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire

Comparative accuracy of 1-hour post-load plasma glucose, glycated albumin, and conventional glycemic measures for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • By

  • Jianzhou Tian

  • Ping Yuan

  • Liguo Tan

  • Youen Zhang

  • Jianing Wang

  • Ziheng Cui

  • Baopeng Tang

  • Jun Shen

  • July 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluation of Diagnostic Efficacy of 1-Hour Post-Load Plasma Glucose

Overview

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of 1-hour post-load plasma glucose (1-h PG) compared to traditional glycemic indicators for identifying type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Background

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rising globally, with significant public health implications. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for effective management and prevention of complications associated with diabetes.

Data Highlights

TestSensitivitySpecificityLR+LR−DOR
1-h PG0.870.887.680.1552.44
GA0.530.864.390.558.53
FPG0.510.9612.630.5124.94
HbA1c0.530.926.750.5213.15
HbA1c-or-FPG0.640.896.280.4115.83

Key Findings

  • 1-h PG demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.87) among the diagnostic tests evaluated.
  • FPG exhibited the highest specificity (0.96) but lower sensitivity compared to 1-h PG.
  • The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for 1-h PG was 52.44.
  • 1-h PG had the lowest negative likelihood ratio (LR−) at 0.15.
  • Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses.

Clinical Implications

The findings indicate that 1-h PG may be a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying T2DM, potentially allowing for earlier detection compared to traditional methods. Clinicians should consider incorporating 1-h PG into their diagnostic strategies, particularly in populations at risk for diabetes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, 1-h PG shows superior diagnostic performance for T2DM compared to traditional glycemic indicators. Further validation through high-quality studies is warranted.

Related Resources & Content

  1. International Diabetes Federation, 2021 -- Diabetes Atlas
  2. American Diabetes Association, 2026 -- Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes
  3. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine — Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of new hypoglycemic drugs on patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
  4. BMC Endocrine Disorders — Effects of digital and remote exercise interventions on HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
  5. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism — Glucose Parameters, Inflammation Markers, and Gut Microbiota Changes of Gut Microbiome–Targeted Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
  6. Frontiers in Endocrinology — Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. Superiority of 1 h plasma glucose vs fasting plasma glucose, 2 h plasma glucose and HbA1c for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  8. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 | Diabetes Care | American Diabetes Association

Original Source(s)

Related Content