Combined posterolateral knee reconstruction: ACL-based injuries perform better compared to PCL-based injuries - Report - MDSpire

Combined posterolateral knee reconstruction: ACL-based injuries perform better compared to PCL-based injuries

  • By

  • Patricia M. Lutz

  • Michael Merkle

  • Philipp W. Winkler

  • Stephanie Geyer

  • Elmar Herbst

  • Sepp Braun

  • Andreas B. Imhoff

  • Matthias J. Feucht

  • January 23, 2021

  • 0 min

Share

Outcomes of Combined Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction: ACL vs PCL Injuries

Overview

This study compared post-operative sports activity and work ability in patients undergoing combined posterolateral corner reconstruction (PLC-R) with either anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Results demonstrated superior functional outcomes, higher return-to-sport rates, and better work ability in ACL-based injuries compared to PCL-based injuries.

Background

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee often occur with concomitant ligamentous injuries, particularly involving the ACL or PCL. These injuries cause instability and pain, potentially accelerating osteoarthritis. While combined PCL-PLC injuries have been studied extensively, less is known about combined ACL-PLC injuries. Biomechanically, PLC insufficiency increases varus load on the ACL graft, suggesting combined reconstruction is necessary to restore knee kinematics and improve outcomes.

Data Highlights

ParameterACL-Based Injury GroupPCL-Based Injury Group
Post-operative Tegner Activity ScaleHigher scores (exact values not provided)Lower scores
Return-to-Sport RateHigherLower
Work AbilityBetter post-operative work intensityReduced work ability
Time to Return to WorkShorterLonger

Key Findings

  • Patients with combined ACL-PLC injuries achieved higher post-operative sports activity levels compared to those with PCL-PLC injuries.
  • Return-to-sport rates were significantly greater in the ACL-based injury group.
  • Work ability and intensity post-operatively were better preserved in patients with ACL-based injuries.
  • Time to return to work was shorter in the ACL group compared to the PCL group.
  • Combined reconstruction of PLC with ACL or PCL is necessary to restore knee biomechanics and improve functional outcomes.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should anticipate better functional recovery and earlier return to sports and work in patients undergoing combined PLC and ACL reconstruction compared to those with PCL-based injuries. Tailored patient education regarding expected outcomes and rehabilitation timelines is essential, especially for PCL-PLC injury patients who may experience prolonged recovery and reduced work capacity.

Conclusion

Combined posterolateral corner reconstruction yields superior post-operative sports and work outcomes in ACL-related injuries compared to PCL-related injuries. These findings support the importance of injury-specific rehabilitation and patient counseling.

References

  1. Technical University of Munich Study 2011-2017 -- Outcomes of Combined Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction

Original Source(s)

Related Content