Wearable technologies for perioperative recovery monitoring in lung cancer surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, recovery outcomes, and evidence certainty - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Wearable technologies for perioperative recovery monitoring in lung cancer surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, recovery outcomes, and evidence certainty
Clinical Report: Utilization of Wearable Devices for Monitoring Recovery in Lung Cancer Surgical Patients
Overview
This systematic review evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of wearable devices in monitoring recovery for lung cancer surgical patients. Findings suggest that while wearable technology may provide objective recovery metrics, the current evidence is limited and heterogeneous.
Background
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways in thoracic oncology aim to improve postoperative recovery through early mobilization and objective assessments. However, traditional methods often rely on intermittent and subjective evaluations, creating a gap in monitoring functional recovery. Wearable devices offer a potential solution by continuously collecting objective data on patient recovery metrics.
Data Highlights
No numerical data available.
Key Findings
Eight reports representing seven independent cohorts were included in the review.
Wearable-enhanced preconditioning reduced prolonged hospital stays from 24% to 7% in one randomized trial.
Observational studies indicated weak but significant associations between perioperative step counts and recovery outcomes.
Feasibility studies confirmed the usability and data transmission capabilities of wearable devices.
Current evidence remains sparse and heterogeneous, necessitating cautious interpretation of findings.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare professionals may consider integrating wearable devices into postoperative care to enhance monitoring of recovery metrics. However, the current evidence base is insufficient to support routine clinical implementation, and further research is needed to establish standardized protocols.
Conclusion
Wearable devices show promise for monitoring recovery in lung cancer surgical patients, but further studies are required to validate their effectiveness and integration into clinical practice.
