Preventing bleeding and surgical complications in transoral robotic surgery for the oropharynx: results of a global survey - Report - MDSpire

Mitigating Hemorrhage and Surgical Risks in Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Procedures: Findings from an International Survey

  • By

  • Elena Russo

  • Gian Marco Pace

  • Andrea Costantino

  • Giannicola Iannella

  • Claudio Sampieri

  • Armando De Virgilio

  • July 20, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Mitigating Hemorrhage and Surgical Risks in TORS

Overview

This international survey characterizes practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal procedures, highlighting significant variability in management strategies. Key findings include the routine use of prophylactic neck vessel ligation and differences in postoperative care across subsites.

Background

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has transformed head and neck surgery by enabling minimally invasive techniques. However, the lack of standardized protocols for managing intraoperative and perioperative complications, particularly bleeding, presents variability in practice patterns.

Data Highlights

FindingPercentage
Surgeons performing prophylactic neck vessel ligation~60%
Routine tracheotomy use4-9%
Patients hospitalized for ≥4 daysMajority
Nasogastric tube use58-64%
Local flap reconstruction after lateral oropharyngectomySignificantly more common

Key Findings

  • 60% of surgeons routinely perform prophylactic neck vessel ligation for both base of tongue and lateral oropharyngectomy.
  • Lingual artery ligation is significantly more frequent in base of tongue procedures compared to lateral oropharyngectomy (p < 0.001).
  • Routine tracheotomy is uncommon, used in only 4-9% of cases, primarily for high-risk patients.
  • Postoperative care varies, with most patients hospitalized for ≥4 days and 58-64% requiring nasogastric tubes.
  • Local flap reconstruction is more common after lateral oropharyngectomy than after base of tongue resection.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should be aware of the variability in TORS management practices.

Conclusion

The survey reveals significant variability in TORS practices.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Global Overview of Robotic-Assisted Liver Surgery: Findings from an International Survey
  3. Submental Approach Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection (SARAND) for Minimally Invasive Bilateral Neck Dissection: A Feasibility Cadaver Dissection Study
  4. Ergonomic Risks in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Resection Mitigated by Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Findings from the VOLCANO Randomized Controlled Trial
  5. International Journal of Colorectal Disease — Patient-reported outcomes in low anterior resection syndrome: a comparison of open and robotic surgery
  6. Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Multidisciplinary Care of Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline - PubMed
  7. Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer | Journal of Robotic Surgery | Springer Nature Link
  8. Frontiers | Preventing bleeding and surgical complications in transoral robotic surgery for the oropharynx: results of a global survey

Original Source(s)

Related Content