Luteinizing hormone supplementation and cumulative live birth rate in assisted reproductive technology cycles among women of advanced reproductive age - Report - MDSpire

Luteinizing hormone supplementation and cumulative live birth rate in assisted reproductive technology cycles among women of advanced reproductive age

  • By

  • Leizhen Xia

  • Wenting Xia

  • Lifeng Tian

  • Jialyu Huang

  • Houyang Chen

  • Li Cai

  • Leixiang Xia

  • Yan Zhao

  • Wei Gao

  • June 17, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Impact of Luteinizing Hormone Supplementation on Cumulative Live Birth Rates

Overview

This study evaluates the impact of luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation on cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) in older women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Findings indicate that LH supplementation may enhance CLBR compared to follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) alone, although results should be interpreted cautiously.

Background

As more women delay childbearing, the population of older women seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasing. Advanced reproductive age is associated with decreased fertility, necessitating effective ovarian stimulation strategies. Understanding the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation in this context is crucial for optimizing ART outcomes.

Data Highlights

GroupCumulative Live Birth RateStatistical Significance
rFSH51.48%-
rFSH + rLH61.31%P = 0.036
rFSH + HMG52.99%P = 0.102

Key Findings

  • Recombinant LH supplementation was associated with a higher CLBR compared to rFSH alone (61.31% vs. 51.48%, P = 0.036).
  • The rFSH + HMG group required significantly higher total gonadotropin doses and longer stimulation duration than the other groups (P < 0.001).
  • Fresh embryo transfer outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.
  • In multivariable analyses, rFSH + rLH showed a higher probability of cumulative live birth compared to both rFSH alone and rFSH + HMG.
  • Baseline characteristics were well balanced across all treatment groups after propensity score matching.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians may consider LH supplementation during ART cycles for older women to potentially improve cumulative live birth rates. However, the decision should be individualized, taking into account the specific circumstances of each patient.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that LH supplementation may offer benefits in ART for older women, but further research is needed to confirm these results and establish clear guidelines for clinical practice.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- Effect of basal LH levels on pregnancy outcome after IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer in patients of different ages: a retrospective study
  2. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation: propensity score and generalized estimating equations analysis over 2000 embryos
  3. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- Non-linear saturation threshold of gonadotropin dose on cumulative live birth rates in advanced-age women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study
  4. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- Impact of trigger-day serum luteinizing hormone levels on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in overweight and obese women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocols: a retrospective cohort study
  5. ESHRE, 2026 -- Guidelines and consensus on ovarian stimulation
  6. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- Luteinizing hormone activity in ovarian stimulation: comparative efficacy and safety of gonadotropins versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone—a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/41/4/498/8495097
  8. Luteinizing hormone activity in ovarian stimulation: comparative efficacy and safety of gonadotropins versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Source(s)

Related Content