Macroscopic Evaluation of Gastric Specimens After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—an Optimum Screening Test for Incidental Pathologies? - Report - MDSpire

Macroscopic Evaluation of Gastric Specimens After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—an Optimum Screening Test for Incidental Pathologies?

  • By

  • Maciej Walędziak

  • Anna Różańska-Walędziak

  • Michał R. Janik

  • Krzysztof W. Paśnik

  • Piotr K. Kowalewski

  • September 5, 2018

  • 0 min

Share

Assessment of Gastric Tissue Samples Post-Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Overview

This study evaluated the utility of macroscopic inspection of gastric specimens after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to detect incidental pathologies. Among 115 patients, macroscopic evaluation showed high specificity (98.2%) and negative predictive value (99.1%) but moderate sensitivity (75%) for detecting pathological findings confirmed microscopically.

Background

Obesity is associated with increased cancer risk and bariatric surgery, particularly laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, is the most effective treatment. The rising number of LSG procedures worldwide raises questions about the necessity of routine histological examination of resected gastric tissue. Current bariatric guidelines do not specify protocols for handling gastric specimens post-LSG, and the clinical value of microscopic analysis remains debated.

Data Highlights

ParameterValue
Number of patients115
Female patients77
Median age (years)38 (Q1:31; Q3:48)
Mean BMI (kg/m2)48.4 ± 8.4
Mean weight loss before surgery (kg)10.6 ± 5
Mean hospital stay (days)2 ± 0.3
History of peptic ulcers16 (13.91%)
Smokers35 (30.43%)
Macroscopic evaluation positive5 cases
Microscopic confirmation of pathology4 cases (3 hyperplastic polyps, 1 neuroendocrine microtumor)
Sensitivity of macroscopic inspection75% (95% CI, 19.4–99.4%)
Specificity of macroscopic inspection98.2% (95% CI, 93.6–99.8%)
Negative predictive value99.1% (95% CI, 95–99.9%)
Gastritis detected microscopically50 specimens (43.48%)
Normal mucosa61 specimens (53.04%)

Key Findings

  • Macroscopic surgical inspection identified suspected pathology in 5 of 115 gastric specimens, with 3 confirmed pathologies microscopically.
  • Microscopic examination revealed 4 pathological cases: 3 hyperplastic polyps and 1 neuroendocrine microtumor.
  • Sensitivity of macroscopic inspection was 75%, specificity was 98.2%, and negative predictive value was 99.1%.
  • Gastritis was found in 43.48% of specimens, while 53.04% had normal mucosa.
  • Routine microscopic examination of all specimens may not be necessary if macroscopic inspection is negative, given the high negative predictive value.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons performing LSG should conduct thorough macroscopic and palpation inspection of resected gastric specimens to identify suspicious lesions. Microscopic examination can be reserved for specimens with macroscopic abnormalities, optimizing resource use without compromising detection of incidental pathologies. This approach balances cost-effectiveness with patient safety in bariatric surgery practice.

Conclusion

Macroscopic inspection of gastric specimens post-LSG is a reliable initial screening tool with high specificity and negative predictive value. Selective microscopic evaluation based on macroscopic findings may be an effective strategy to detect incidental pathologies while conserving healthcare resources.

References

  1. Janik et al. 2017 -- National trends in bariatric surgery
  2. Hansen et al. -- Evaluation of gastric specimens post-LSG
  3. AbdullGaffar et al. -- Histopathological findings in bariatric specimens
  4. Yardimci et al. -- Neoplasm detection in gastric specimens
  5. Canil et al. -- Importance of preoperative gastroscopy and pathology
  6. Almazeedi et al. -- Recommendations on gastric specimen evaluation

Original Source(s)

Related Content