Correction: Assessing the Use of Medical Insurance Claims and Electronic Health Records to Measure COVID‑19 Vaccination During Pregnancy - Report - MDSpire

Correction: Assessing the Use of Medical Insurance Claims and Electronic Health Records to Measure COVID‑19 Vaccination During Pregnancy

  • By

  • Coates, Matthew M.

  • Rowe, Stacey L.

  • Sullivan, Sheena G.

  • Munoz, Flor M.

  • Arah, Onyebuchi A.

  • Regan, Annette K.

  • March 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Correction: Evaluating Medical Insurance Claims and EHRs in Tracking COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy

Overview

This correction addresses the previously misstated conflict of interest disclosures related to the study on tracking COVID-19 vaccination rates during pregnancy using medical insurance claims and electronic health records. The corrected statement clarifies the authors' affiliations and consulting roles unrelated to the presented research.

Background

Accurate tracking of COVID-19 vaccination rates during pregnancy is critical for monitoring vaccine uptake and safety in this vulnerable population. Medical insurance claims and electronic health records (EHRs) are commonly used data sources for such surveillance. Transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest is essential to maintain the integrity of research findings in this area.

Data Highlights

No numerical data are presented in this correction notice; it solely addresses conflict of interest disclosures.

Key Findings

  • The original article contained an incorrect conflict of interest statement.
  • The corrected statement details specific consulting and advisory roles of several authors unrelated to the presented research.
  • AKR serves on a data safety monitoring board for unrelated matters.
  • SGS consults for multiple vaccine manufacturers unrelated to this study.
  • FMM has multiple roles including investigator and consultant for various COVID-19 vaccine and treatment studies, unrelated to this research.
  • SLR consults for CSL Seqirus on unrelated work.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the corrected conflict of interest disclosures to appropriately interpret the study findings. Maintaining transparency about potential conflicts supports trust in research evaluating COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Conclusion

The correction ensures accurate disclosure of author conflicts of interest, reinforcing the credibility of research on tracking COVID-19 vaccination rates in pregnant populations.

References

  1. Drug Safety 2025 -- Correction: Evaluating the Role of Medical Insurance Claims and Electronic Health Records in Tracking COVID-19 Vaccination Rates During Pregnancy

Original Source(s)

Related Content