Clinical Report: In Vivo Evaluation of Early Osseointegration in 3D-Printed Implants

Overview

This study evaluated early osseointegration of two custom 3D-printed titanium implants in sheep, finding no significant differences in mechanical strength or histological outcomes between the two designs. Both implants demonstrated comparable integration with bone tissue after four weeks.

Background

Early osseointegration is vital for the long-term success of implants, as it prevents aseptic loosening and ensures stability. The design of implants, particularly the porosity and pore size, plays a crucial role in promoting bone integration. This study contributes to understanding how variations in 3D-printed titanium implants affect osseointegration, which is essential for improving implant designs.

Data Highlights

No significant differences were found between the two implant designs in terms of mechanical properties or histological outcomes.

Key Findings

• No significant differences in mechanical strength (p = .87) between P1 and P2 implants.
• Energy absorption (p = .80) and stiffness (p = .66) were also comparable between the two designs.
• Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant differences in bone or fibrous tissue fractions.
• No foreign body reactions were observed in any specimens.
• Future research should explore the performance of these implants under weight-bearing conditions.

Clinical Implications

The findings suggest that both implant designs are viable options for early osseointegration without significant differences in performance. Clinicians should consider the mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed implants when selecting devices for patients requiring osseointegration.

Conclusion

This study indicates that variations in pore size and porosity in 3D-printed titanium implants do not significantly affect early osseointegration. Further research is warranted to assess their performance in more demanding conditions.

Related Resources & Content

1. Frontiers in Surgery, 2026 -- In-house 3D printed porous implants: does strontium-coating enhance osseointegration?
2. Comparative Analysis of Early Radiographic Osseointegration Between a Novel Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Collar and an Earlier Smooth HA-Coated Collar for Megaprostheses, 2022
3. Sustained Success of Customized 3D Printed Titanium Implants in Complex Pelvic Reconstruction: Insights from 106 Cases Over a Decade, 2025
4. Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Placement of Customized Orthopaedic Implants Created Through Additive Manufacturing in a Sheep Model, 2023
5. AO/AAP consensus on prevention and management of peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Summary report - PMC
6. Lumbar Fusion With Micro- & Nano-Textured, 3D Printed Porous Titanium Versus PEEK Interbody Cages in TLIF: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial, 2026
7. Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices | FDA
8. AO/AAP consensus on prevention and management of peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Summary report - PMC
9. Lumbar Fusion With Micro- & Nano-Textured, 3D Printed Porous Titanium Versus PEEK Interbody Cages in TLIF: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial - Joshua H. Weinberg, Nathan Ritchey, Witty Kwok, Shravani Khisti, Bryan Ladd, Stephanus Viljoen, Siri S. Khalsa, David S. Xu, Andrew J. Grossbach, 2026
10. Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices | FDA