The effect of peer support on fear of disease progression in patients with glioma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
The effect of peer support on fear of disease progression in patients with glioma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Report: Impact of Peer Support on Disease Progression Anxiety in Glioma Patients
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aims to evaluate the effectiveness of peer support in reducing fear of disease progression (FoP) among glioma patients.
Background
Glioma patients often experience significant fear of disease progression due to the high recurrence rates and associated psychological distress. Peer support has emerged as a potential intervention to address these fears.
Data Highlights
No numerical data available as this is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Key Findings
Glioma patients exhibit high levels of fear of disease progression, impacting their quality of life.
Peer support can provide emotional, social, and practical assistance to patients managing their disease.
Current treatment options for glioma include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, but recurrence rates remain high.
Fear of disease progression is correlated with increased anxiety, depression, and other adverse health outcomes.
Effective interventions are needed to address the psychological needs of glioma patients.
Clinical Implications
The findings from this systematic review may guide the development of peer support interventions tailored for glioma patients.
Conclusion
This systematic review will provide evidence on the effectiveness of peer support in managing fear of disease progression in glioma patients.
Dr. Alicia Morgans of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute reported at #ASCO26 that ARACOG found darolutamide was associated with less decline in cognitive testing than enzalutamide, which may help guide treatment choice.