Anatomical basis for sensory preservation in robotic mastectomy - Report - MDSpire

Anatomical basis for sensory preservation in robotic mastectomy

  • By

  • Hunter A Holley

  • Sandra Hembrecht

  • Níamh M Smyth

  • Mathieu Colbert

  • Fabio Quondamatteo

  • Arnold D K Hill

  • November 18, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Anatomical Foundations for Sensory Retention in Robotic-Assisted Mastectomy

Overview

This study identifies the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the fourth intercostal nerve as primary contributors to nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensation. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (rNSM) preserves these nerves better due to its lateral incisions and precise dissection, resulting in improved postoperative nipple sensation.

Background

The nipple-areolar complex is vital for lactation, sexual function, and psychological well-being, making sensory preservation important after mastectomy. Innervation primarily arises from the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves, with the fourth intercostal nerve playing a dominant role. Traditional mastectomy techniques often damage these nerves, leading to significant sensory loss. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy offers a novel approach that may better preserve NAC sensation by avoiding periareolar incisions and minimizing tissue trauma.

Data Highlights

ParameterFindings
Primary nerves innervating NACAnterior cutaneous branch (ACB) and lateral cutaneous branch (LCB) of the fourth intercostal nerve
Pathway of ACB (fourth ICN)Superficial, subdermal, bypassing breast tissue
Pathway of LCB (fourth ICN)Deeper through breast tissue to NAC
Additional nerve contributionsVariable from second, third, and fifth ICNs and ancillary branches
Preservation of nipple sensation after rNSMUp to 55%
Preservation of nipple sensation after traditional NSMApproximately 27–40%

Key Findings

  • The ACB and LCB of the fourth intercostal nerve are the main sensory nerves to the NAC.
  • The ACB of the fourth ICN follows a consistent superficial subdermal route, avoiding breast tissue.
  • The LCB of the fourth ICN traverses deeper breast tissue to reach the NAC.
  • There is significant inter-individual variability in nerve contributions, including from the second, third, and fifth ICNs.
  • Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy uses lateral incisions that spare the superficial ACB pathway, improving sensory preservation.
  • Clinical data show rNSM preserves nipple sensation in up to 55% of cases, superior to traditional methods.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should consider the consistent superficial pathway of the ACB of the fourth intercostal nerve when planning incisions to optimize sensory preservation. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy, with its lateral incision placement and precise dissection, offers a technique that reduces nerve injury and improves postoperative nipple sensation. Awareness of anatomical variability is essential to tailor nerve-sparing approaches for each patient.

Conclusion

Detailed anatomical mapping confirms the critical role of the fourth intercostal nerve branches in NAC sensation and supports the sensory benefits observed with robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. Incorporating these anatomical insights into surgical planning can enhance patient quality of life by preserving nipple sensation after breast cancer surgery.

References

  1. Farr et al. 2023 -- Clinical series on rNSM sensory preservation
  2. Smeele et al. 2022 -- Systematic review on NAC innervation

Original Source(s)

Related Content