Self-reported versus measured anthropometry yields clinically relevant body mass index underestimation - Report - MDSpire

Self-reported versus measured anthropometry yields clinically relevant body mass index underestimation

  • By

  • Maria Letizia Spizzichini

  • Davide Masi

  • Krzysztof Glaser

  • Dario Tuccinardi

  • Daniele Gianfrilli

  • Lucio Gnessi

  • Mikiko Watanabe

  • January 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Discrepancies Between Self-Reported and Measured Anthropometric Data Underestimate BMI

Overview

This study of 408 Italian endocrinology outpatients found that self-reported height and weight systematically bias BMI downward, leading to a 20% misclassification rate of WHO BMI categories, primarily under-classification of obesity. Height was over-reported by an average of 3.13 cm, weight under-reported by 0.97 kg, and BMI underestimated by 1.63 kg/m².

Background

Self-reported height and weight are commonly used in clinical and epidemiologic settings due to ease and low cost, but they introduce systematic errors. Individuals tend to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in BMI values that are lower than measured values. This bias can delay appropriate obesity management and varies by demographic factors such as age and sex. Prior studies have not focused on Italian clinical populations in endocrinology and obesity settings.

Data Highlights

ParameterMean Difference (Self-Reported - Measured)95% Confidence Interval
Height (cm)+3.13+2.90 to +3.36
Weight (kg)−0.97−1.29 to −0.65
BMI (kg/m²)−1.63−1.80 to −1.47

WHO BMI-category misclassification rate: 20.0% (mostly under-classification 19.4%)

Sensitivity for obesity detection (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) using self-report: 0.72

Specificity for obesity detection using self-report: 1.00

Key Findings

  • Participants over-reported height by an average of 3.13 cm.
  • Weight was under-reported by an average of 0.97 kg.
  • BMI calculated from self-reported data underestimated true BMI by 1.63 kg/m² on average.
  • 20% of participants were misclassified into incorrect WHO BMI categories based on self-report, predominantly under-classified.
  • Sensitivity of self-reported BMI to detect obesity was 72%, with perfect specificity (100%).
  • Age predicted height over-reporting; age and measured BMI predicted weight under-reporting and BMI underestimation.

Clinical Implications

Given the substantial underestimation of BMI from self-reported data and the resulting misclassification of obesity status, clinicians should prioritize objective anthropometric measurements in outpatient settings. Reliance on self-reported height and weight may delay appropriate obesity diagnosis and treatment decisions, particularly in older adults and patients with higher BMI.

Conclusion

Self-reported anthropometric data systematically underestimate BMI and lead to significant misclassification of obesity in clinical populations. Objective measurement of height and weight is essential to ensure accurate obesity assessment and appropriate clinical management.

References

  1. Study Authors/Policlinico Umberto I/2024 -- Discrepancies Between Self-Reported and Measured Anthropometric Data Result in Significant Underestimation of Body Mass Index

Original Source(s)

Related Content