Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after ileostomy reversal for the prevention of wound healing complications in colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after ileostomy reversal for the prevention of wound healing complications in colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial
Preventive Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy After Ileostomy Reversal in Colorectal Cancer
Overview
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of postoperative negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in reducing wound healing complications (WHC) and surgical site infections (SSI) following ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients. NPWT significantly decreased the incidence of WHC and SSI compared to standard wound care.
Background
Colorectal cancer surgeries, especially those involving the lower rectum, carry a high risk of complications including anastomotic leaks. Diverting ileostomy is commonly used to reduce leak risk but requires a second surgery for closure, which is associated with frequent wound healing complications and surgical site infections. Traditional closure techniques such as purse-string sutures reduce infection risk but prolong healing time and affect cosmetic outcomes. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) offers a potential method to combine reduced healing time with lower infection rates.
Data Highlights
Outcome
NPWT Group
Control Group
Sample Size
38 patients
38 patients
Wound Healing Complications (WHC)
Significantly reduced incidence (exact % not provided)
33% incidence (baseline)
Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
Reduced incidence compared to control
Higher incidence compared to NPWT
Skin Sutures Used
4–6 loose sutures every 1 cm
6–8 loose sutures every 7–9 mm
Key Findings
NPWT significantly reduced postoperative wound healing complications after ileostomy closure.
Incidence of surgical site infections was lower in the NPWT group compared to standard care.
NPWT allowed for fewer skin sutures due to stabilization of wound edges, reducing risk of dehiscence.
NPWT facilitated evacuation of exudate, preventing seroma and hematoma formation.
The study was a single-center randomized controlled trial with 76 patients equally divided between NPWT and control groups.
NPWT combines benefits of reduced healing time and lower infection risk compared to purse-string and primary closure techniques.
Clinical Implications
Implementing NPWT after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients can reduce wound healing complications and surgical site infections, potentially improving recovery and cosmetic outcomes. NPWT also allows for less dense skin suturing and effective management of wound exudate, which may decrease postoperative morbidity.
Conclusion
Postoperative NPWT is an effective intervention to mitigate wound healing complications and surgical site infections following ileostomy reversal in colorectal cancer patients, offering a superior alternative to conventional wound closure methods.
References
Jagiellonian University Medical College Ethics Committee 2019 -- Trial Protocol Approval