Surgical outcomes of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology diagnostic category class I, II, and III thyroid nodules - Report - MDSpire

Surgical outcomes of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology diagnostic category class I, II, and III thyroid nodules

  • By

  • Sang-Wook Park

  • Ga Young Lee

  • Min Ji Kim

  • Minsu Kwon

  • Young Ho Jung

  • Seung-Ho Choi

  • Dong Eun Song

  • Yoon Se Lee

  • May 25, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Surgical Results for Thyroid Nodules Classified as Bethesda System Categories I, II, and III

Overview

Revise to specify that the malignancy rate of 32.3% applies to all classes I-III.

Background

Thyroid nodules are common, with a notable percentage harboring malignancy. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology provides a framework for assessing the risk of cancer in these nodules, guiding clinical decision-making. Understanding the malignancy rates associated with different Bethesda categories is crucial for optimizing management strategies and surgical interventions.

Data Highlights

Bethesda ClassMalignancy Rate
I23.5%
II20.4%
III49.4%

Key Findings

  • Carcinoma was confirmed in 32.3% of patients with Bethesda classes I–III nodules.
  • Malignancy rates were 23.5% for class I, 20.4% for class II, and 49.4% for class III nodules.
  • Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was the most common malignant type, accounting for 54.8% of cases.
  • Atypia with both nuclear and architectural features (AUS-N/A) was identified as an independent predictor of malignancy in class III nodules.
  • Increased nodule size on ultrasound was associated with a higher risk of malignancy in class III nodules.
  • The prognosis after surgery for Bethesda classes I, II, and III was favorable with a low recurrence rate.

Clinical Implications

Discuss the implications of AUS-N/A in decision-making for all Bethesda classes.

Conclusion

Bethesda class III nodules present a heightened risk of malignancy, warranting careful evaluation and potential surgical intervention. The study reinforces the need for a nuanced approach to thyroid nodule management.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Updates in Surgery, 2026 -- Risk of malignancy and necessity of completion thyroidectomy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), more than expected in endemic region
  2. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2026 -- Clinical and ultrasound-based optimization of post-FNA management decisions in Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study
  3. Updates in Surgery, 2021 -- Indeterminate Cytology in Thyroid Nodules: Correlation of Nodule Size, Histopathological Features, and Clinical Outcomes in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas — A Retrospective Multicenter Study Involving 761 Patients
  4. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism -- Longitudinal Study of Cytologically Low-Risk Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules
  5. What Has Changed in the 2025 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer? Part 1: Preoperative Evaluation, Diagnosis and Surgery - PMC
  6. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of Afirma GSC to ThyroSeq V3 in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules - PMC
  7. Cancer Risk in Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules: Impact of AUS Subclassification and Molecular Profiling - ScienceDirect
  8. American Thyroid Association Guidelines
  9. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of Afirma GSC to ThyroSeq V3 in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules - PMC
  10. Cancer Risk in Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules: Impact of AUS Subclassification and Molecular Profiling - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content