Clinical Report: Comparative Analysis of Meniscal Repair vs. Meniscectomy

Overview

This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients undergoing combined ACL and ALS reconstruction with or without meniscal treatment.

Background

ACL injuries frequently occur alongside meniscal injuries, which are critical for knee stability and function. Timely treatment of meniscal injuries is essential to prevent complications such as osteoarthritis and graft rupture.

Data Highlights

Key Findings

• Patients with no meniscal injury had significantly higher functional scores than those with meniscectomy or repair.
• All groups showed significant improvement in Lysholm, Tegner, and IKDC scores postoperatively (p < 0.05).
• The repair group incurred significantly higher costs compared to the no injury and partial meniscectomy groups.
• No significant differences in stability and safety indices were observed among the three groups (p > 0.05).
• Meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy demonstrated comparable functional outcomes following ACL and ALS reconstruction.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider the functional outcomes and cost implications when deciding between meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy during ACL and ALS reconstruction. The choice of meniscal treatment may not significantly affect stability and safety indices.

Conclusion

Meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy yield similar functional outcomes in patients undergoing combined ACL and ALS reconstruction.

Related Resources & Content

1. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017 -- Outcomes of Meniscal Repair Compared to Meniscal Resection in Patients Undergoing Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study of 6398 Cases
2. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020 -- Impact of Meniscal Repair on Strength Recovery Six Months Post-ACL Reconstruction
3. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021 -- Revision rates for meniscus repairs stand at 19%, with a notable incidence of failures occurring after two years post-surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up duration of five years
4. Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, 2022 -- AAOS Guidelines
5. Coronal extrusion of the lateral meniscus remains unchanged following pullout repair of the posterior root at short-term evaluation
6. Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II—surgical strategy
7. The Role of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
8. Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus
9. Management of Anterior Cruciate
10. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed
11. No Significant Difference in Return-to-Sport Rates Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - PubMed
12. Does concomitant meniscus repair and meniscectomy show different efficacy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
13. Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Ramp Lesion during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) | QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | Oxford Academic