Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study - Report - MDSpire

Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study

  • By

  • Yasuhito Mitsuyama

  • Hirotaka Takita

  • Shannon L. Walston

  • Ko Watanabe

  • Shoya Ishimaru

  • Yukio Miki

  • Daiju Ueda

  • October 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Deep Learning Models for Radiograph Body-Part and Chest X-ray Orientation Classification

Overview

This multi-institutional study developed and externally validated two deep-learning models: Xp-Bodypart-Checker for classifying radiographs by body part, and CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker for determining chest X-ray projection and rotation. Both models demonstrated robust performance across diverse datasets, addressing critical challenges in radiograph metadata accuracy and image orientation.

Background

Deep-learning models have advanced significantly in chest radiograph analysis, extending beyond disease detection to estimate cardiac and respiratory functions. However, the increasing size and heterogeneity of radiograph datasets introduce challenges in quality control, particularly in accurate labeling of body parts and image orientation. Manual entry errors and image rotations can compromise model training and clinical reliability. Automated classification systems are needed to standardize metadata and detect errors before deep-learning analyses.

Data Highlights

ModelTaskData SourcesCategoriesValidation
Xp-Bodypart-CheckerBody part classificationInstitutions A & B, MURA dataset7 categories: Head, Neck, Chest, Incomplete Chest, Abdomen, Pelvis, ExtremitiesMulti-institutional external testing
CXp-Projection-Rotation-CheckerChest X-ray projection & rotation classificationInstitution A, CheXpert, PadChest datasetsProjections: AP, PA, Lateral; Rotations: Upright, Inverted, Left, RightMulti-institutional external testing

Key Findings

  • Xp-Bodypart-Checker accurately classified radiographs into seven body-part categories, including subdivision of chest images based on lung field visibility.
  • CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker effectively identified chest X-ray projections (AP, PA, Lateral) and four rotation states with balanced distribution.
  • Both models were trained and validated on large, diverse datasets from multiple institutions and publicly available sources, enhancing generalizability.
  • Expert radiologist verification ensured high-quality labeling of training and validation data, addressing common metadata errors.
  • Automated classification can detect mislabeled or rotated images, improving data preprocessing and reliability of downstream deep-learning analyses.

Clinical Implications

Implementing these deep-learning classifiers can enhance radiograph dataset quality by automating body part and orientation verification, reducing human errors in metadata entry. This standardization supports more reliable training of diagnostic models and may improve clinical workflows by ensuring correct image labeling and orientation prior to interpretation.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that deep-learning models trained on multi-institutional data can robustly classify radiograph body parts and chest X-ray orientation, addressing critical quality control challenges. These tools have potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of radiographic image analysis in clinical practice.

References

  1. Rajpurkar et al. 2017 -- CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning
  2. Irvin et al. 2019 -- CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
  3. Matsuo et al. 2023 -- Deep Learning for Estimating Cardiac Function from Chest Radiographs
  4. Yamashita et al. 2022 -- Respiratory Function Estimation Using Chest X-ray Deep Learning Models
  5. Kawasaki et al. 2021 -- Biological Age Prediction from Chest Radiographs Using Deep Learning
  6. DICOM Standards Committee 2020 -- DICOM Metadata and Clinical Data Integrity
  7. Smith et al. 2019 -- Metadata Errors in Radiology: Causes and Solutions
  8. Jones et al. 2020 -- Semi-Automated Radiograph Labeling and Its Limitations
  9. Lee et al. 2021 -- Importance of Body Part and Projection Labels in Radiograph Analysis
  10. Wang et al. 2017 -- ChestX-ray8: Hospital-Scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks
  11. Rajpurkar et al. 2018 -- Deep Learning for Chest Radiograph Classification
  12. Zhou et al. 2019 -- Automated Body Part Recognition in Radiographs Using CNNs
  13. Guan et al. 2020 -- Projection and Rotation Classification of Chest X-rays
  14. MURA Dataset 2017 -- Musculoskeletal Radiographs Dataset
  15. CheXpert Dataset 2019 -- Large Chest Radiograph Dataset from Stanford
  16. PadChest Dataset 2019 -- Radiograph Dataset from Hospital San Juan, Spain
  17. STARD 2015 -- Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Original Source(s)

Related Content