Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser - Report - MDSpire

Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser

  • By

  • Olivier Traxer

  • Etienne Xavier Keller

  • February 6, 2019

  • 0 min

Share

Thulium Fiber Laser vs Holmium:YAG Laser for Kidney Stone Treatment

Overview

The Holmium:YAG laser has been the gold standard for laser lithotripsy due to its effective fragmentation and safety profile. The newer Thulium fiber laser, operating at a wavelength closer to a water absorption peak, offers potential advantages in stone fragmentation efficiency and safety. Current literature suggests that Thulium fiber laser may expand the capabilities of laser lithotripsy beyond those of Holmium:YAG.

Background

Holmium:YAG laser has been used in urology for over two decades, primarily for tissue ablation and urinary stone lithotripsy. It is effective across all stone types, compatible with thin flexible fibers, and has a favorable safety profile due to limited tissue penetration. Despite advances such as high-frequency low-pulse energy settings, Holmium:YAG lasers face limitations in treating larger stones. The Thulium fiber laser is emerging as a next-generation technology with distinct physical properties that may overcome these limitations.

Data Highlights

The Holmium:YAG laser operates at 2120 nm with an absorption coefficient in water of approximately 3 mm−1, leading to limited optical penetration depth (~400 µm). The Thulium fiber laser operates at 1940 nm, near a water absorption peak with an absorption coefficient of approximately 14 mm−1, suggesting more efficient energy absorption and potential for enhanced stone fragmentation. Kidney stones have porous structures filled with water, which may facilitate thermal expansion and vaporization mechanisms during laser lithotripsy, particularly relevant for the Thulium fiber laser wavelength.

Key Findings

  • Holmium:YAG laser is effective for all urinary stone types and allows use of thin, flexible fibers with minimal energy loss.
  • Holmium:YAG laser’s wavelength (2120 nm) has moderate water absorption, limiting tissue penetration and enhancing safety.
  • Thulium fiber laser operates at 1940 nm, a wavelength with higher water absorption, potentially improving stone fragmentation via thermal expansion and vaporization of water within stone pores.
  • Kidney stones possess porous microstructures containing water, which may be exploited by Thulium fiber laser for more efficient lithotripsy.
  • Thulium fiber laser technology may overcome current Holmium:YAG limitations, especially for larger stones and finer fragmentation (“stone dust”).
  • Evidence supports photothermal and mechanical mechanisms of stone fragmentation for both lasers, with Thulium fiber laser possibly enhancing these effects due to its wavelength properties.

Clinical Implications

The Thulium fiber laser’s higher water absorption wavelength may allow for more efficient and precise stone fragmentation with potentially reduced tissue damage. This could translate into improved outcomes in flexible ureteroscopy, especially for larger or harder stones. Clinicians should consider emerging evidence on Thulium fiber laser technology as it may expand treatment options and improve lithotripsy efficiency.

Conclusion

While Holmium:YAG laser remains the current standard for laser lithotripsy, the Thulium fiber laser presents promising advantages due to its physical properties and interaction with water in kidney stones. Further clinical studies are warranted to establish its role and optimize its use in urologic stone management.

References

  1. Delafontaine & Soret 1878 -- Discovery of Holmium
  2. Cleve 1879 -- Naming of Holmium and Thulium
  3. Laser-Tissue Interaction Studies 2000s -- Water Absorption and Safety Profiles
  4. Recent Studies on Kidney Stone Porosity and Laser Fragmentation Mechanisms

Original Source(s)

Related Content