Radiotherapy Receipt and Omission After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: Study Design and Methods
Overview
The study was designed to assess whether omission of adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS). The supplied article excerpt describes the rationale and retrospective cohort methods but does not provide study results, so comparative outcomes cannot be reported.
Background
Breast-conserving surgery is an established treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) combines tumor removal with volume-displacement or volume-replacement techniques to address contour and volume changes. The source describes adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) as conventional after breast-conserving surgery to reduce locoregional recurrence risk and notes potential tissue effects, including microvascular injury, fibrosis, fat necrosis, skin contracture, and breast-volume loss. It also cites LUMINA and IDEA as prospective studies of RT omission in carefully selected patients with favorable tumor biology or low genomic risk. The study assessed the association between RT omission and postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes after OPBCS.
Data Highlights
The provided excerpt reports the study design and eligibility period but contains no numerical outcome results.
Study feature
Details reported
Design
Retrospective evaluation of consecutive adult women
Study period
2017–2024
Population
Patients undergoing lumpectomy and immediate or delayed oncoplastic reconstruction; mastectomy cases and patients without complete data were excluded
Comparison groups
Adjuvant radiotherapy versus radiotherapy omission; patients who refused radiotherapy were included in the omission cohort
Outcomes of interest
Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes
Key Findings
The study retrospectively evaluated adult women who underwent OPBCS within one healthcare network from 2017 through 2024.
Eligible procedures included lumpectomy followed by immediate or delayed oncoplastic reconstruction using volume displacement or volume replacement techniques.
Patients were categorized by receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy; patients refusing radiotherapy were included in the omission group.
The stated study objective was to assess the association of radiotherapy omission with postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes after OPBCS.
The article introduction describes radiotherapy-related tissue changes, including microvascular injury, fibrosis, fat necrosis, skin contracture, and breast-volume loss.
The supplied excerpt does not report cohort size, comparative outcome data, or study conclusions; the related article listings provide titles and citations but no findings relevant to this cohort.
Clinical Implications
The supplied excerpt describes the study rationale and methods but does not report comparative results. It therefore does not establish whether RT omission was associated with differences in complications or patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusion
The supplied material describes a retrospective study evaluating RT receipt or omission after OPBCS, including postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes. Because results are not included, no comparative outcome conclusion can be drawn.
by Abbas M. Hassan, Carson Park, Kathryn Borders, Rachel M. Danforth, Ravinder Bamba, R. Jason VonDerHaar, Ivan Hadad, Mary E. Lester, Carla S. Fisher, Aladdin H. Hassanein