Disparities in Access to Neurosurgical Services Across the United States
-
By
-
Linda Liverani
-
Nina Dwumfour-Poku
-
Corinna C. Zygourakis
-
Silvia D. Vaca
-
June 18, 2026
Clinical Report: Disparities in Access to Neurosurgical Services Across the United States
Overview
This report highlights significant disparities in access to neurosurgical services in the United States, with 9.8% of the population lacking adequate access. Rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities are particularly affected, necessitating systemic changes to improve access and workforce diversity.
Background
Access to neurosurgical care is critical for timely treatment of conditions like traumatic brain injury and spinal cord compression. Despite a sufficient national neurosurgeon density, geographic maldistribution leaves many areas underserved, particularly rural regions. Addressing these disparities is essential for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare inequities.
Data Highlights
Approximately 9.8% of the US population lacks adequate access to neurosurgical services, translating to over 32 million Americans. Only 2.3% of neurosurgeons practice in nonmetropolitan areas, highlighting significant geographic maldistribution.
Key Findings
- 80% of US counties lack neurosurgeons.
- Unemployment, low educational attainment, and poverty predict reduced neurosurgeon availability.
- States with fewer training programs have lower representation of women in neurosurgery.
- Graduating medical students from underrepresented groups are more likely to intend to practice in underserved areas.
- Women represented only 9.6% of board-certified neurosurgeons in 2020.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare systems must implement targeted strategies to enhance neurosurgical access, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Initiatives such as telemedicine and rural training programs can help bridge the gap in care availability and workforce diversity.
Conclusion
Addressing the disparities in neurosurgical access is crucial for ensuring equitable healthcare delivery. A multifaceted approach is required to improve workforce distribution and representation in the field.
Related Resources & Content
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2025 -- Trends in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Insights from the National Cancer Database (2004–2020)
- JAMA Network Open, 2025 -- Right-Sizing Trauma System Expansion Through an Equity Lens
- Congenital Malformations in Low- and Middle-Income Nations: The Overlooked Aspect of Global Surgical Care, 2014
- The ASCO Post, 2023 -- Rural Patients With Cancer: Receipt of Surgical Care at High- vs Low-Volume Hospitals
- Frontiers, 2026 -- Inequitable Access to Neurosurgical Care in the United States
- Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient 2022 Standards - Revised July 2025
- About the Verification, Review, and Consultation Program | ACS
- Population Access to US Trauma Centers and Teletrauma-Using Emergency Departments
- Frontiers | Inequitable Access to Neurosurgical Care in the United States
- Large-Core Ischemic Stroke Endovascular Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association
- Disparities in Timely Access to Certified Stroke Care Among US Census Tracts, by Prevalence of Health Risk Factors
- Stroke Center Certification and Within-Hospital Racial Disparities in Treatment
- Racial and ethnic disparities in endovascular treatment outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PMC
- Guidelines for the Management of Severe TBI, 4th Edition — Brain Trauma Foundation
- Telestroke and Timely Treatment and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke - PMC
- 2025 Measures Report Trauma
Based on findings from:
Inequitable access to neurosurgical care in the United States
Linda Liverani, Nina Dwumfour-Poku, Corinna C. Zygourakis, Silvia D. Vaca. Frontiers In Neurology, 2026.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1850876/full
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.