Inequitable access to neurosurgical care in the United States - Report - MDSpire

Inequitable access to neurosurgical care in the United States

  • By

  • Linda Liverani

  • Nina Dwumfour-Poku

  • Corinna C. Zygourakis

  • Silvia D. Vaca

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Disparities in Access to Neurosurgical Services Across the United States

Overview

This report highlights significant disparities in access to neurosurgical services in the United States, with 9.8% of the population lacking adequate access. Rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities are particularly affected, necessitating systemic changes to improve access and workforce diversity.

Background

Access to neurosurgical care is critical for timely treatment of conditions like traumatic brain injury and spinal cord compression. Despite a sufficient national neurosurgeon density, geographic maldistribution leaves many areas underserved, particularly rural regions. Addressing these disparities is essential for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare inequities.

Data Highlights

Approximately 9.8% of the US population lacks adequate access to neurosurgical services, translating to over 32 million Americans. Only 2.3% of neurosurgeons practice in nonmetropolitan areas, highlighting significant geographic maldistribution.

Key Findings

  • 80% of US counties lack neurosurgeons.
  • Unemployment, low educational attainment, and poverty predict reduced neurosurgeon availability.
  • States with fewer training programs have lower representation of women in neurosurgery.
  • Graduating medical students from underrepresented groups are more likely to intend to practice in underserved areas.
  • Women represented only 9.6% of board-certified neurosurgeons in 2020.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare systems must implement targeted strategies to enhance neurosurgical access, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Initiatives such as telemedicine and rural training programs can help bridge the gap in care availability and workforce diversity.

Conclusion

Addressing the disparities in neurosurgical access is crucial for ensuring equitable healthcare delivery. A multifaceted approach is required to improve workforce distribution and representation in the field.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2025 -- Trends in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Insights from the National Cancer Database (2004–2020)
  2. JAMA Network Open, 2025 -- Right-Sizing Trauma System Expansion Through an Equity Lens
  3. Congenital Malformations in Low- and Middle-Income Nations: The Overlooked Aspect of Global Surgical Care, 2014
  4. The ASCO Post, 2023 -- Rural Patients With Cancer: Receipt of Surgical Care at High- vs Low-Volume Hospitals
  5. Frontiers, 2026 -- Inequitable Access to Neurosurgical Care in the United States
  6. Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient 2022 Standards - Revised July 2025
  7. About the Verification, Review, and Consultation Program | ACS
  8. Population Access to US Trauma Centers and Teletrauma-Using Emergency Departments
  9. Frontiers | Inequitable Access to Neurosurgical Care in the United States
  10. Large-Core Ischemic Stroke Endovascular Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association
  11. Disparities in Timely Access to Certified Stroke Care Among US Census Tracts, by Prevalence of Health Risk Factors
  12. Stroke Center Certification and Within-Hospital Racial Disparities in Treatment
  13. Racial and ethnic disparities in endovascular treatment outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PMC
  14. Guidelines for the Management of Severe TBI, 4th Edition — Brain Trauma Foundation
  15. Telestroke and Timely Treatment and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke - PMC
  16. 2025 Measures Report Trauma

Original Source(s)

Related Content