Dynamic triage in hypertension: a quantitative framework for follow-up scheduling based on clinician heuristics and home blood pressure data - Report - MDSpire

Adaptive Triage in Hypertension Management: A Quantitative Approach for Follow-Up Scheduling Utilizing Clinician Insights and Home Blood Pressure Measurements

  • By

  • Jair Andrade

  • Derek T. O'Keeffe

  • Ian McCabe

  • Jennifer Doran

  • David Tiernan

  • Andrew J. Simpkin

  • July 21, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Adaptive Triage in Hypertension Management

Overview

This study investigates clinician preferences for follow-up scheduling in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients using simulated home blood pressure data. Findings indicate that recent blood pressure readings influence follow-up timing decisions, with variations noted between consultant and non-consultant physicians.

Background

Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, affecting approximately one-third of the global population. Despite effective treatments, many patients remain poorly controlled due to factors such as clinical inertia and organizational failures. Understanding clinician decision-making in follow-up scheduling is crucial.

Data Highlights

MeasureValue
Pearson correlation0.83
Median absolute difference0.1 weeks
Follow-up scheduling change per 1 mmHg increase0.13 weeks earlier
95% Confidence Interval0.09–0.17

Key Findings

  • Clinicians' follow-up scheduling decisions correlate with recent blood pressure readings.
  • Higher systolic blood pressure readings above 140 mmHg lead to earlier follow-up scheduling.
  • Consultants and non-consultants differ in their follow-up timing preferences based on blood pressure levels.
  • Findings are hypothesis-generating and require further validation in real-world settings.

Clinical Implications

Understanding the decision-making process of clinicians regarding follow-up scheduling is important.

Conclusion

The study highlights the role of recent blood pressure measurements in clinician follow-up scheduling decisions for hypertension management. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of algorithm-assisted scheduling.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. 2025 High Blood Pressure (BP) Guideline - Professional Heart Daily | American Heart Association
  6. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | New England Journal of Medicine
  7. Updated meta-analysis for antihypertensive treatment guided by home blood pressure compared to treatment based on office blood pressure: systematic review | Hypertension Research
  8. 2025 High Blood Pressure (BP) Guideline - Professional Heart Daily | American Heart Association
  9. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | New England Journal of Medicine
  10. Updated meta-analysis for antihypertensive treatment guided by home blood pressure compared to treatment based on office blood pressure: systematic review | Hypertension Research

Original Source(s)

Related Content