Feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage: a retrospective cohort study - Report - MDSpire

Feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage: a retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Xiaozun Yang

  • Bin Hu

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluation of Uniportal Thoracoscopic Sublobar Resection Without Chest Tube Drainage

Overview

This study evaluates the feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage, comparing outcomes with traditional chest tube drainage. The findings suggest that a tubeless approach may reduce operational time, hospital stay, and postoperative pain in selected patients.

Background

The tubeless strategy in thoracoscopic surgery has gained attention as it may reduce postoperative complications and improve recovery times. With advancements in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), minimizing invasiveness while maintaining safety is crucial. Understanding the implications of omitting chest tube drainage in selected patients can enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Data Highlights

OutcomeTubeless Group (n=60)Chest Tube Group (n=60)P-value
Pneumothorax1 (1.7%)0 (0.0%)0.500
Operational TimeLowerHigher<0.001
Perioperative Blood LossLowerHigher0.007
Total Hospital StayLowerHigher0.001
Postoperative Pain VAS (POD 1)LowerHigher0.003
Postoperative Pain VAS (POD 2)LowerHigher0.020

Key Findings

  • Pneumothorax occurred in 1.7% of the tubeless group, with no significant difference from the chest tube group.
  • Operational time was significantly lower in the tubeless group (P < 0.001).
  • Total hospital stay was reduced in the tubeless group (P = 0.001).
  • Postoperative pain VAS scores were lower in the tubeless group on POD 1 and 2 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.020, respectively).
  • No significant differences in overall patient satisfaction between the two groups.
  • Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Clinical Implications

The findings suggest that uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage may be a viable option for selected low-risk patients, potentially leading to improved recovery metrics. Clinicians should consider patient selection carefully and monitor for complications, particularly pneumothorax.

Conclusion

Uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage appears feasible in selected patients, with benefits in operational efficiency and postoperative recovery. Further research is warranted to confirm these results.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers, Frontiers in Oncology, 2026 -- Feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage: a retrospective, cohort study
  2. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Document on the Management of Pleural Drains After Pulmonary Lobectomy: Expert Consensus Document - ScienceDirect
  3. Evaluating the Viability and Benefits of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Pulmonary Lobectomy
  4. Innovative Periareolar Technique for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Right Middle Lobectomy
  5. Factors Influencing the Need for Reoperation Following Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
  6. Surgical Endoscopy — A Customized Algorithm for Chest Drain Removal After Minimally Invasive Lobectomy: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial
  7. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Document on the Management of Pleural Drains After Pulmonary Lobectomy: Expert Consensus Document - ScienceDirect
  8. Frontiers | Feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection without chest tube drainage: a retrospective, cohort study

Original Source(s)

Related Content