Comparative effectiveness of regional analgesia techniques after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials - Report - MDSpire

Comparative effectiveness of regional analgesia techniques after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

  • By

  • Danling Hu

  • Weiwei Cai

  • Anwen Zheng

  • Shuaili You

  • Shan Zhong

  • June 15, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Efficacy Comparison of Regional Analgesia Methods Following Gastrectomy

Overview

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the analgesic efficacy of regional analgesia techniques compared to systemic analgesia following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Findings indicate that regional techniques, particularly intertransverse process plane block, significantly reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Background

Postoperative pain management is crucial in enhancing recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a prevalent malignancy with high morbidity and mortality rates. Effective analgesia not only improves patient comfort but also facilitates early mobilization and reduces the risk of complications such as pulmonary issues and gastrointestinal dysmotility. The integration of multimodal analgesia strategies, including regional techniques, is essential to minimize opioid-related adverse effects and optimize recovery.

Data Highlights

Analgesia TechniqueOutcomeMean Difference (MD)95% Confidence Interval (CI)
Intertransverse Process Plane Block (ITPB)Long-term pain at rest-2.28-3.63 to -0.94
ITPBLong-term pain during movement-1.86-2.81 to -0.90
Epidural Analgesia (EA)Postoperative opioid consumption-2.25-3.52 to -0.99
EACD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio0.180.03 to 0.34

Key Findings

  • Regional analgesia techniques significantly reduce postoperative pain compared to systemic analgesia.
  • Intertransverse process plane block (ITPB) shows superior efficacy in managing long-term pain at rest and during movement.
  • Epidural analgesia (EA) is associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption and improved immunomodulatory outcomes.
  • Evidence certainty for the findings ranges from low to moderate, indicating the need for cautious interpretation.
  • Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm the benefits of regional analgesia techniques.

Clinical Implications

The findings support the use of regional analgesia techniques, particularly ITPB, as effective options for managing postoperative pain in gastrectomy patients. Clinicians should consider incorporating these techniques into multimodal analgesia strategies to enhance recovery and minimize opioid-related complications.

Conclusion

Regional analgesia techniques may offer significant advantages in postoperative pain management following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, the limited certainty of evidence necessitates further investigation to validate these findings.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  6. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  7. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  8. ERAS Society - Upper GI
  9. Epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on pain relief and recovery after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: randomized clinical trial | BJS Open | Oxford Academic
  10. The Immunomodulatory Effect of Various Anaesthetic Practices in Patients Undergoing Gastric or Colon Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content