Economic Evaluation of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology
Overview
This systematic review evaluates the economic implications of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in oncology. Further research is warranted.
Background
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are critical for capturing patient experiences and outcomes in oncology. The integration of electronic platforms for PROMs (ePROMs) faces challenges related to technology and healthcare systems, necessitating a thorough economic evaluation.
Data Highlights
No numerical data or trial data were provided in the source material.
Key Findings
Implementation of ePROMs is hindered by sociotechnical factors, including complexity and integration challenges.
Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis methods are inadequate for ePROM interventions due to their complexity.
Preliminary evidence indicates ePROM use is associated with reduced emergency department visits.
Patient-centered care is enhanced through the use of ePROMs, addressing significant symptom burdens in cancer patients.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare professionals should consider the potential benefits of ePROMs in improving patient outcomes and resource utilization. However, attention must be given to the challenges of implementing these systems in clinical practice.
Conclusion
The economic evaluation of ePROMs in oncology highlights implementation challenges that need to be addressed.
