Coronary artery calcium scoring: expanding the new standard by photon-counting detector CT—Part I: Impact of tube voltage, tube current, slice thickness, and quantum iterative reconstructions - Report - MDSpire

Coronary artery calcium scoring: expanding the new standard by photon-counting detector CT—Part I: Impact of tube voltage, tube current, slice thickness, and quantum iterative reconstructions

  • By

  • Nicola Fink

  • Lennart R. Koetzier

  • Emese Zsarnoczay

  • Milan Vecsey-Nagy

  • Dmitrij Kravchenko

  • Muhammad Taha Hagar

  • Jim O’Doherty

  • Moritz C. Halfmann

  • Pal Suranyi

  • Gijs D. van Praagh

  • Jens Ricke

  • Pal Maurovich-Horvat

  • Tobias Bäuerle

  • Martin J. Willemink

  • Akos Varga-Szemes

  • Tilman Emrich

  • February 19, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Advancements in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Photon-Counting Detector CT

Overview

This phantom study evaluated the effects of tube voltage, tube current, slice thickness, and quantum iterative reconstructions on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT). Results demonstrated that optimized PCD-CT protocols with reduced radiation dose and thin-slice reconstructions improved reproducibility and accuracy of CAC quantification compared to current standards.

Background

Coronary artery calcium scoring is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events and is recommended for risk reclassification in borderline or intermediate risk patients. Current CT-based CAC scoring protocols rely on standards established in 2007 using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) with 120 kVp and 3 mm slices, which have limitations in reproducibility and variability. Photon-counting detector CT is a new technology offering improved spatial resolution, dose efficiency, and image quality, potentially enabling better CAC quantification. However, standardized protocols for CAC scoring using PCD-CT have not yet been established.

Data Highlights

ParameterValues Tested
Tube Voltage90 kVp, 120 kVp
Radiation Dose Levels (CTDIvol)100%, 75%, 50%, 25% (based on 1.5, 3.3, 7.0 mGy for small, medium, large phantoms)
Slice Thickness / Increment3.0/3.0 mm, 1.0/1.0 mm
Quantum Iterative Reconstruction StrengthLevels 1 to 4
Phantom SizesSmall (30×20 cm), Medium (35×25 cm), Large (40×30 cm)

Key Findings

  • PCD-CT protocols using reduced tube voltage (90 kVp) and radiation dose levels down to 25% maintained accurate CAC quantification with improved reproducibility.
  • Thin-slice reconstructions (1 mm) combined with higher iterative reconstruction strength levels enhanced detectability and reduced image noise compared to standard 3 mm slices.
  • Repositioning of phantoms between scans simulated realistic variability, demonstrating that optimized PCD-CT protocols reduced interscan variability of Agatston scores.
  • Compared to multivendor EID-CT systems, PCD-CT showed superior HU stability, lower image noise, and higher contrast-to-noise ratio, contributing to more reliable CAC scoring.
  • The study supports lowering radiation dose while improving image quality and reproducibility for CAC scoring using PCD-CT technology.

Clinical Implications

Implementing optimized PCD-CT protocols with lower tube voltage, reduced radiation dose, and thin-slice iterative reconstructions can improve the accuracy and reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring. This advancement may enhance risk stratification and clinical decision-making while minimizing patient radiation exposure. Clinicians should consider adopting updated PCD-CT protocols as they become available to improve CAC assessment.

Conclusion

Photon-counting detector CT enables improved coronary artery calcium scoring through optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters, offering enhanced reproducibility and dose efficiency compared to current standards. These findings support the development of new standardized protocols for clinical CAC quantification using PCD-CT.

References

  1. van Praagh et al 2022 -- Multivendor EID-CT CAC Scoring Protocol
  2. Rutten et al 2018 -- Impact of Scan Position on CAC Variability
  3. McCollough et al 2007 -- Standard CAC Scoring Recommendations
  4. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline -- Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
  5. Siemens Healthineers -- NAEOTOM Alpha PCD-CT Technical Details

Original Source(s)

Related Content