Optimizing retinopathy of prematurity screening in China using a single objective criterion: a 10-year retrospective analysis - Report - MDSpire

Optimizing retinopathy of prematurity screening in China using a single objective criterion: a 10-year retrospective analysis

  • By

  • Zhenglin Li

  • Suo Guo

  • Haojue Xu

  • Wentao Dong

  • June 17, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Enhancing Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity in China

Overview

Expand on the implications of reduced over-screening and maintained sensitivity.

Background

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of preventable childhood blindness, necessitating effective screening strategies. Current practices in China involve both objective and subjective criteria, leading to potential over-screening and unnecessary procedures. This study aims to assess the clinical utility of a strictly objective criterion to optimize ROP screening.

Data Highlights

ParameterObjective GroupSubjective Group
ROP Cases705 (48.5%)Not specified
Severe ROP Cases370 (25.5%)3 cases
Coverage of ROP Cases98.2%Not applicable
Coverage of Severe ROP Cases99.2%Not applicable

Key Findings

  • The objective screening criterion (BW < 2000g or GA < 32 weeks) identified 98.2% of ROP cases.
  • Severe ROP cases were diagnosed at a significantly higher rate in the objective group compared to the subjective group (P < 0.001).
  • Lower gestational age (OR = 1.42 per week decrease) and lower birth weight (OR = 1.21 per 100 g decrease) were identified as independent risk factors for severe ROP.
  • All severe ROP cases in the subjective group were diagnosed before 2017, indicating minimal ongoing clinical value for subjective criteria.
  • Subjective extended screening led to unnecessary examinations and resource burden without significant benefit.

Clinical Implications

The findings support the implementation of a unified objective criterion for ROP screening in tertiary neonatal care settings to enhance efficiency and reduce unnecessary procedures. Clinicians are encouraged to reconsider the reliance on subjective criteria that may lead to over-screening.

Conclusion

Adopting a single objective criterion for ROP screening can effectively identify high-risk infants while minimizing unnecessary examinations. This approach may inform future clinical guidelines and improve resource allocation in neonatal care.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Retinal Physician, New Tool Improves Screening for ROP, 2018 -- New Tool Improves Screening for ROP
  2. Retinal Physician, Incorporating AI Into Global ROP Care, 2025 -- Incorporating AI Into Global ROP Care
  3. Retinal Physician, Do Cost Concerns Limit Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity?, 2008 -- Do Cost Concerns Limit Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity?
  4. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in China: a five-year cohort study in seven screening centers - PMC, 2026 -- Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in China: a five-year cohort study in seven screening centers
  5. Global Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - ScienceDirect, 2026 -- Global Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Model
  6. Ophthalmology Management — Study Shows Retinal Scans Predict Neonatal Lung Disease
  7. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in China: a five-year cohort study in seven screening centers - PMC
  8. Global Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content