Clinical Report: FDA Approves Gedatolisib in Breast Cancer
Overview
The FDA has approved gedatolisib in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for adults with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer lacking a PIK3CA mutation. The approval is based on improvements in progression-free survival compared to fulvestrant alone.
Background
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, particularly in hormone receptor-positive subtypes. The approval of new therapeutic agents like gedatolisib addresses the need for effective treatment options in patients who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy.
Data Highlights
Regimen
Median PFS (months)
Objective Response Rate (%)
Gedatolisib + Fulvestrant + Palbociclib
9.3
32
Gedatolisib + Fulvestrant
7.4
28
Fulvestrant Alone
2.0
1
Key Findings
Gedatolisib, when combined with fulvestrant and palbociclib, resulted in a median progression-free survival of 9.3 months.
Patients receiving gedatolisib with fulvestrant alone had a median progression-free survival of 7.4 months.
Fulvestrant alone showed a median progression-free survival of only 2.0 months.
Objective response rates were 32% for the triplet regimen, 28% for the doublet, and 1% for fulvestrant alone.
Warnings for gedatolisib include stomatitis, dermatologic reactions, hyperglycemia, and embryo-fetal toxicity.
The recommended dosage is 180 mg administered as a 30-minute IV infusion once weekly.
Clinical Implications
Monitoring for potential adverse effects, including stomatitis and hyperglycemia, is essential during treatment.
Conclusion
The approval of gedatolisib offers improved progression-free survival for patients with specific disease characteristics.
In a pooled analysis of more than 1.5 million patients, sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with higher risks of HCC and ICC, while artificially-sweetened beverages showed no independent association with hepatic cancer.
Review of 88 studies found AI systems achieved high accuracy for identifying abnormal voices, but performance declined among higher-level laryngeal disorder classifications.