An Overview of Global Neurosurgery Research in the United States: Identifying Gaps and Potential Areas for Growth - Report - MDSpire

An Overview of Global Neurosurgery Research in the United States: Identifying Gaps and Potential Areas for Growth

  • By

  • Tirone Young

  • Sophie Epstein

  • Mehek Dedhia

  • Rahul Raj

  • Olufisayo Atanda-Ogunleye

  • Isabelle M. Germano

  • March 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: An Overview of Global Neurosurgery Research in the US

Overview

This report analyzes U.S.-affiliated contributions to global neurosurgery (GNS) research, highlighting trends, thematic focuses, and institutional representation. It identifies gaps in the literature and opportunities for enhancing neurosurgical care in low- and middle-income countries.

Background

Global neurosurgery addresses significant disparities in neurosurgical care and training worldwide, which are critical for improving health outcomes. The engagement of U.S. institutions in GNS is vital for building capacity in regions with limited resources, aligning with global health initiatives. Understanding the contributions of U.S. researchers can guide future investments and collaborative efforts in this field.

Data Highlights

No numerical data available in the provided text.

Key Findings

  • U.S. institutions have increasingly supported neurosurgical development in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Mapping scholarly activity in GNS helps identify successful collaborative models and guides future investments.
  • Academic publications are crucial for shaping research priorities and informing policy related to global health.
  • There is a need for standardized academic milestones for faculty and residents in GNS.
  • Understanding publication patterns can optimize training and strengthen research networks in neurosurgery.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should recognize the importance of global neurosurgery initiatives in addressing inequities in surgical care. Engaging in collaborative research and educational exchanges can enhance neurosurgical training and improve outcomes in underserved regions.

Conclusion

The study underscores the necessity of characterizing U.S. contributions to global neurosurgery to identify gaps and inform future strategies for equitable surgical care. Enhanced collaboration and investment in this field are essential for sustainable health infrastructure.

References

  1. BJS (British Journal of Surgery), 2020 -- Analysis of Global Investments in Surgical Research from 2016 to 2020: A Review of Public and Philanthropic Funding
  2. BJS (British Journal of Surgery), 2020 -- Advancing Surgical Research: Addressing Funding Disparities and Clinical Trial Imbalances
  3. BJS (British Journal of Surgery), 2020 -- A Five-Year Review: Advancements and Unforeseen Outcomes Following the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery
  4. Utilizing Social Media in Neurosurgery: A Comprehensive Literature Review
  5. WHO, 2025 -- 11 million lives lost each year: urgent action needed on neurological care
  6. Johns Hopkins University, 2025 -- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Randomized Clinical Trials
  7. The current landscape of United States global neurosurgery scholarly work: gaps and opportunities - PMC
  8. 11 million lives lost each year: urgent action needed on neurological care
  9. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Randomized Clinical Trials - Johns Hopkins University
  10. The current landscape of United States global neurosurgery scholarly work: gaps and opportunities - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content