Impact of inferior pulmonary ligament dissection versus preservation during thoracoscopic upper lobectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis - Report - MDSpire

Impact of inferior pulmonary ligament dissection versus preservation during thoracoscopic upper lobectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis

  • By

  • Xinhe Huang

  • Zheng Zhu

  • Baisheng Xie

  • Kaifei Chen

  • Yue Xie

  • Yi Zhu

  • April 20, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Comparison of Outcomes Following Dissection versus Preservation of the Inferior Pulmonary Ligament in Thoracoscopic Upper Lobectomy

Overview

This study evaluates the impact of inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) division versus preservation during thoracoscopic upper lobectomy on postoperative outcomes in a retrospective analysis of 95 patients. Findings suggest that IPL division may lead to poorer lung function and increased cough severity, although results should be interpreted cautiously due to the nature of the study.

Background

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) becoming the standard for pulmonary lobectomy due to its associated benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. The management of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy remains controversial, with varying practices among surgeons. Understanding the implications of IPL division versus preservation is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.

Data Highlights

OutcomeGroup P (Preservation)Group D (Division)P-value
Bronchial Angle Change (3 months)78.1 ± 7.8°68.1 ± 7.2°0.046
Lung Volume (6 months)3615 ± 475 mL3392 ± 489 mL0.027
FEV1% (6 months)73.04 ± 9.3669.06 ± 10.110.049
DLCO (6 months)80.82 ± 10.3576.06 ± 11.080.033
Total LCQ-MC Score (6 months)17.70 ± 1.7216.98 ± 1.690.042

Key Findings

  • IPL division was associated with a significant change in bronchial angle after left-sided surgery.
  • Patients in the IPL division group had smaller lung volumes at 6 months compared to the preservation group.
  • FEV1% and DLCO were lower in the IPL division group at 6 months.
  • Cough severity, as measured by the LCQ-MC score, was worse in the IPL division group.
  • No significant differences were observed for other postoperative outcomes.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should consider the potential negative impacts of IPL division on lung function and cough severity when planning thoracoscopic upper lobectomy. The findings highlight the need for careful evaluation of surgical techniques and patient selection to optimize outcomes.

Conclusion

The study suggests that IPL division may not provide clear benefits over preservation and could be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts, particularly focusing on long-term functional recovery and quality of life.

References

  1. Author(s)/Org, Surgical Endoscopy, 2023 -- Evaluation of LigaSure™ Bipolar Vessel Sealer Versus Monopolar Electrocoagulation in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy
  2. Author(s)/Org, Surgical Endoscopy, 2019 -- Evaluating the Viability and Benefits of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Pulmonary Lobectomy
  3. Author(s)/Org, Surgical Endoscopy, 2024 -- Utilizing the left-lateral decubitus jackknife position for laparoscopic removal of right posterior hepatic tumors: An effective and secure technique
  4. Author(s)/Org, Surgical Endoscopy, 2023 -- Factors Influencing the Need for Reoperation Following Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Original Source(s)

Related Content