Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a clinical study on procedural parameters and post-procedural recurrence - Report - MDSpire

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a clinical study on procedural parameters and post-procedural recurrence

  • By

  • Feiyue Liu

  • Maojing Wang

  • Yuefeng Jv

  • Zhihui Wang

  • Shanglang Cai

  • May 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Influence of Intracardiac Echocardiography on RFCA Outcomes

Overview

This study evaluates the impact of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) on procedural metrics and recurrence rates in radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Results indicate that ICE improves outcomes by influencing abnormal force-over-time (FOT) distribution, which is linked to recurrence rates.

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity, including stroke and heart failure. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a recommended first-line treatment for AF, yet recurrence remains a major concern. The integration of advanced imaging techniques like ICE during RFCA may enhance procedural success and reduce recurrence rates.

Data Highlights

ParameterHR/RR95% CIP-value
eGFR influencing recurrenceHR = 0.970.94–0.990.017
High FOT count in RPS segment influencing recurrenceHR = 1.481.05–2.090.025
eGFR influencing ablation timeRR = 1.0051.000–1.0090.038
High FOT count in LF segment influencing procedure timeRR = 1.0721.008–1.1390.029
Cardiomyopathy influencing procedure timeRR = 2.1811.339–3.5540.002

Key Findings

  • ICE guidance improves the distribution of abnormal FOT across pulmonary vein segments.
  • ICE-guided RFCA is associated with lower recurrence rates compared to non-ICE procedures.
  • Baseline eGFR and FOT counts in specific segments are significant predictors of recurrence and ablation time.
  • ICE reduces procedure time and enhances safety by minimizing complications.
  • High FOT counts in certain segments correlate with increased procedure duration.

Clinical Implications

The use of ICE during RFCA may enhance procedural outcomes by optimizing FOT parameters, thereby reducing recurrence rates. Clinicians should consider incorporating ICE into their ablation protocols to improve patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.

Conclusion

ICE plays a crucial role in improving RFCA outcomes for AF by influencing procedural metrics and recurrence rates. Its integration into clinical practice may lead to better management of atrial fibrillation.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020 -- Post-Ablation Sinus Heart Rate and Long-Term Recurrence Risks in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
  2. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020 -- Evaluating Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Initial Versus Repeat Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Findings from the German Ablation Registry
  3. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2021 -- Predictive Value of Early Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence Following Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation on Late Recurrence Outcomes
  4. PubMed, 2024 -- Update of the ESC atrial fibrillation guidelines: From the DGK commission for clinical cardiovascular medicine
  5. JAMA Cardiology, 2025 -- Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
  6. Clinical Research in Cardiology — Impact of Comorbidity on Mortality and Readmission Rates in Patients with Existing Implantable Pacemakers Undergoing Catheter Ablation: Insights from the German Ablation Registry
  7. Intracardiac echocardiography improves lesion quality and ablation efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients
  8. [Update of the ESC atrial fibrillation guidelines : From the DGK commission for clinical cardiovascular medicine] - PubMed
  9. Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Original Source(s)

Related Content