External fixation versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study - Report - MDSpire

External fixation versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study

  • By

  • Antonio Vadalà

  • Cristiano Benelli

  • Francesco Suraci

  • Benedetto Carta

  • Giorgio Baldassari

  • Nicola Maffulli

  • April 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Comparative Analysis of External Fixation and RSA for PHFs

Overview

This study compares clinical and functional outcomes of external fixation (EF) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in older adults with proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). The findings suggest that both surgical interventions have distinct advantages and limitations, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on patient characteristics.

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are common in older adults, particularly among osteoporotic women, and pose significant management challenges. The choice between surgical options like EF and RSA is influenced by factors such as fracture type, patient comorbidities, and surgeon preference. Understanding the outcomes associated with these interventions is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in this demographic.

Data Highlights

No specific numerical data was provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • EF offers a minimally invasive approach with reduced operative duration and preservation of humeral head vascularity.
  • RSA has shown satisfactory long-term outcomes, making it a popular choice for immediate functional restoration.
  • Patient selection for EF or RSA is influenced by surgeon preference and patient-specific factors.
  • Both surgical techniques were evaluated in a cohort of patients aged 65-80 years with displaced Neer two- or three-part fractures.
  • Postoperative rehabilitation protocols differed between the two groups, impacting recovery timelines.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should consider individual patient profiles, including comorbidities and functional needs, when choosing between EF and RSA for treating PHFs. A tailored approach may enhance recovery outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

The comparative analysis of EF and RSA highlights the importance of personalized surgical strategies in managing proximal humerus fractures in older adults. Further studies are warranted to refine treatment protocols based on evolving clinical evidence.

References

  1. Court-Brown, C. M., Caesar, B., 2020 -- Outcomes of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Distal Humerus Fractures in Patients Aged 70 and Older
  2. Outcomes of Trauma-Related Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Perspective, 2024
  3. Non-displaced to minimally displaced intraoperative periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty do not impact short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, 2021
  4. Comparison of Extramedullary and Intramedullary Fixation Techniques for Unstable Trochanteric Femoral Fractures (AO Type 31-A2): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2023

Original Source(s)

Related Content