Ketamine versus propofol for procedural sedation in pediatric pulsed dye laser therapy: a prospective randomized trial - Report - MDSpire

Ketamine versus propofol for procedural sedation in pediatric pulsed dye laser therapy: a prospective randomized trial

  • By

  • Marija Stevic

  • Nina Ristic

  • Ivana Budic

  • Branislav Trifunovic

  • Vesna Marjanovic

  • Suzana Bojic

  • Dejan Zivorad Marković

  • Marija Jovanovski Srceva

  • Dragan Nenadic

  • Ana Vlajkovic Ivanovic

  • Lazar Milic

  • Dejan Nikolic

  • April 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Comparison of Ketamine and Propofol for Pediatric Sedation

Overview

This study compares the safety and efficacy of ketamine and propofol for sedation during pediatric pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment. Findings indicate that while propofol is associated with a higher risk of respiratory depression, ketamine presents other adverse effects, highlighting the need for individualized anesthetic selection.

Background

Pulsed dye laser therapy is the gold standard for treating port-wine stains in children, often requiring analgosedation due to pain and the need for immobility. The choice of sedative agent is critical, as it can significantly impact patient safety and procedural outcomes. Understanding the comparative effects of commonly used agents like ketamine and propofol is essential for optimizing sedation strategies in pediatric outpatient procedures.

Data Highlights

OutcomePropofolKetamine
Respiratory Depression19.5%2.6%
HypertensionLowerHigher
TachycardiaLowerHigher
HypotensionHigherLower
Sedation TimeShorterLonger
Recovery TimeShorterLonger

Key Findings

Incorporate psychomimetic effects and postoperative nausea and vomiting for ketamine.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider the risk of respiratory depression when selecting sedatives for pediatric PDL therapy, particularly for longer procedures. While ketamine may provide greater respiratory stability, it is associated with other adverse effects that must be managed. Individualized anesthetic selection based on patient factors and procedural requirements is essential.

Conclusion

Both ketamine and propofol are effective for pediatric sedation during PDL therapy, but their differing safety profiles necessitate careful consideration in clinical practice. Tailoring sedation strategies to individual patient needs can enhance safety and procedural success.

References

  1. Pediatric Cardiology, Longitudinal Analysis of Continuous Propofol Infusion During the Perioperative Phase in a Pediatric Cardiac ICU Over 25 Years
  2. Critical Care, Continuous ketamine infusion for surgical patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment
  3. Intensive Care Medicine, A randomized controlled study on the effects of daily sedation breaks in critically ill pediatric patients
  4. AAPD | Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures
  5. Surgical Endoscopy — The Use of Intravenous Lidocaine Reduces the Rate of Sedation-Related Adverse Events in Elderly Patients Undergoing ERCP: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
  6. Key Advance: Procedural Sedation for Children
  7. AAPD | Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures*

Original Source(s)

Related Content