Bioactive IGF-I Levels in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Growth Hormone Treatment
Overview
This study established pediatric, sex-specific reference ranges for bioactive IGF-I and compared these with total IGF-I and related biomarkers in healthy children and those receiving growth hormone (GH) therapy. Findings indicate that bioactive IGF-I levels generally remain within reference ranges during GH treatment, even when total IGF-I levels are elevated, suggesting bioactive IGF-I may better reflect GH therapy effects.
Background
Growth hormone therapy is used in children with GH deficiency and various non-GHD conditions, with dosing traditionally guided by total IGF-I levels. However, total IGF-I may not reliably indicate treatment efficacy in non-GHD patients and sustained high levels raise safety concerns. IGF-I bioactivity, reflecting receptor activation, may provide a more accurate measure of GH therapy impact. This study aimed to define bioactive IGF-I reference ranges and evaluate its levels in GH-treated pediatric patients.
Data Highlights
Parameter
Correlation Coefficient (r)
Significance (P)
Bioactive IGF-I vs Total IGF-I (males)
0.61
<.001
Bioactive IGF-I vs IGF-I/IGFBP-3 (males)
0.57
<.001
Bioactive IGF-I vs Total IGF-I (females)
0.58
<.001
Bioactive IGF-I vs IGF-I/IGFBP-3 (females)
0.59
<.001
Bioactive IGF-I vs IGF-II
-0.29
<.001
Patients with bioactive IGF-I > +2SD
13% (17/126)
Patients with total IGF-I > +2SD
25% (32/126)
Patients with both bioactive and total IGF-I > +2SD
9
Key Findings
Bioactive IGF-I levels increase with age in healthy children and correlate positively with total IGF-I and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio.
Bioactive IGF-I correlates positively with IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid labile subunit measured by LC-MS/MS.
Bioactive IGF-I and IGF-II levels show a negative correlation.
Only 13% of GH-treated patients had bioactive IGF-I above +2 standard deviations, compared to 25% for total IGF-I.
In non-GHD patients, bioactive IGF-I standard deviation scores were significantly lower than total IGF-I scores.
Monitoring bioactive IGF-I may help optimize GH dosing, particularly in specific patient subgroups.
Clinical Implications
Bioactive IGF-I measurement provides a potentially more accurate assessment of GH therapy effects than total IGF-I, especially in non-GHD pediatric patients. Incorporating bioactive IGF-I monitoring could enhance individualized GH dosing and improve safety by avoiding unnecessary supranormal IGF-I exposure. This approach may refine treatment efficacy evaluation and risk assessment during GH therapy.
Conclusion
Bioactive IGF-I remains within normal ranges in most GH-treated children, even when total IGF-I is elevated, supporting its use as a complementary biomarker to optimize GH therapy. Further research may clarify its role in improving clinical management of pediatric growth disorders.
References
Copenhagen Puberty Study III -- Reference Population Data
SAGhE Study -- Safety and Appropriateness of Growth Hormone Treatments in Europe
Previous Study on Bioactive IGF-I in SGA Children -- 15
by Lea Vilmann, Jakob Albrethsen, Jørgen Holm Petersen, Stine Agergaard Holmboe, Peter Christiansen, Katharina Maria Main, Line Cleemann, Kristian Horsman Hansen, Jan Frystyk, Casper P Hagen, Anders Juul