Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on usefulness, acceptability and implementation conditions of socially assistive robots in France: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on usefulness, acceptability and implementation conditions of socially assistive robots in France: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis
Perspectives of Healthcare Providers on Socially Assistive Robots in France
Overview
This cross-sectional survey explores healthcare professionals' perceptions of socially assistive robots (SARs) in France, revealing generally high perceived usefulness but selective acceptability. The findings indicate that attitudes towards SARs are influenced by context, perceived usefulness, and prior knowledge rather than demographic factors.
Background
The integration of socially assistive robots in healthcare is increasingly relevant due to workforce shortages and the rising demand for care. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions is crucial for the successful implementation of these technologies, which can enhance care delivery and address operational challenges. Ethical and organizational considerations also play a significant role in the acceptance of SARs in clinical settings.
Data Highlights
Characteristic
Percentage
Prior knowledge of robots
77%
High perceived usefulness for physical tasks
Not specified
High perceived usefulness for recreational support
Not specified
Lower ratings for therapeutic mediation and feeding
Not specified
Importance of ethical, organizational, and regulatory factors
Very important
Key Findings
148 healthcare professionals participated in the survey.
77% reported prior knowledge of socially assistive robots.
Perceived usefulness was high for physical tasks and recreational support.
Acceptability was higher for general use than for personal clinical practice.
Cluster analysis identified three attitudinal profiles: low, moderate, and high acceptability.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare professionals generally favor the use of socially assistive robots for logistical and organizational support. However, their acceptance is conditional and varies based on the context and perceived usefulness of the robots.
Conclusion
The study highlights the need for tailored implementation strategies that address ethical and organizational factors to enhance the acceptance of socially assistive robots in healthcare settings.
