Structural Disadvantage in Adolescence and Biological Aging in Early Midlife - Report - MDSpire

Structural Disadvantage in Adolescence and Biological Aging in Early Midlife

  • By

  • Taylor W. Hargrove

  • Alena Sorensen D’Alessio

  • Sylvie Tuder

  • Ariayana Harrell

  • Lauren Gaydosh

  • Audrey L. Kelly

  • Allison E. Aiello

  • Kathleen Mullan Harris

  • Brandt Levitt

  • Chantel L. Martin

  • May 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Adolescent Structural Inequities and Their Impact on Biological Aging

Overview

This report examines the influence of adolescent structural inequities on biological aging in early adulthood, highlighting the role of racism-related structural economic and social disadvantage (RR-SESD). The findings indicate that early-life exposure to RR-SESD is associated with accelerated biological aging and inflammation-related DNA methylation, particularly among Black individuals.

Background

Understanding the impact of structural racism on health outcomes is crucial as the aging population in the U.S. continues to grow. Disparities in aging-related diseases, especially among Black individuals, necessitate a focus on early-life exposures to structural inequities. This research aims to elucidate how these inequities contribute to biological aging and health disparities.

Data Highlights

No numerical data or trial data provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • Structural racism is a significant driver of aging-related disease outcomes and inequalities.
  • Early-life contexts, such as exposure to RR-SESD, may have lasting effects on biological aging.
  • Epigenetic clocks can predict biological aging and are influenced by social exposures.
  • Black individuals experience a disproportionate burden of aging-related diseases compared to their White counterparts.
  • Prior studies have linked social exposures to epigenetic aging, but few have focused on RR-SESD.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider the impact of structural inequities on health trajectories when assessing adolescent patients. Screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) can help identify at-risk youth and connect them with necessary resources to mitigate long-term health disparities.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the importance of addressing structural inequities in early life to improve health outcomes and reduce biological aging disparities in adulthood. Further research is needed to explore these associations across diverse populations.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Hargrove et al, JAMA Network Open, 2024 -- Molecular Adaptations to US County-Level Social Inequality
  2. Conexiant, 2024 -- Teen Conflict and the Body’s Clock
  3. BMC Medicine, 2024 -- Adverse events in both childhood and adulthood are associated with molecular, clinical and functional markers of ageing
  4. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2024 -- The Impact of Chronic Infections on Biological Aging in the U.S. Population
  5. CMS, 2024 -- FY 2024 Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (LTCH PPS) Final Rule
  6. Epigenetic Aging and Racialized, Economic, and Environmental Injustice: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program, JAMA Network Open, 2024
  7. Mortality in the United States, 2024
  8. FY 2024 Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (LTCH PPS) Final Rule — CMS-1785-F and CMS-1788-F Fact Sheet | CMS
  9. Epigenetic Aging and Racialized, Economic, and Environmental Injustice: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program | Genetics and Genomics | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
  10. Mortality in the United States, 2024

Original Source(s)

Related Content