Rhythm vs. rate control for treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Rhythm vs. rate control for treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Clinical Report: Rhythm Control vs Rate Control in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of rhythm control versus rate control strategies in managing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following cardiac surgery. Rhythm control was associated with higher odds of conversion to sinus rhythm and increased risk of medication-related adverse events.
Background
Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a prevalent complication after cardiac surgery, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Its incidence varies significantly based on the type of surgical procedure, with rates as high as 50% following combined valve surgery with CABG.
Data Highlights
Outcome
Rhythm Control
Rate Control
Hospital Length of Stay
−0.41 days (95% CI: −3.23, 2.42)
No significant difference
Odds of Conversion to Sinus Rhythm
OR: 4.01 (95% CI: 1.30, 12.39)
Risk of Adverse Events
RR: 3.05 (95% CI: 1.05, 8.89)
Key Findings
No significant difference in hospital length of stay between rhythm control and rate control strategies.
Rhythm control strategies were associated with higher odds of in-hospital conversion to sinus rhythm.
Rhythm control strategies increased the risk of medication-related adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, and syncope.
The meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 894 patients.
The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and utilized the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for quality appraisal.
Clinical Implications
The findings suggest that while rhythm control may facilitate quicker conversion to sinus rhythm, it also carries a higher risk of adverse events. Clinicians should weigh these risks when deciding on management strategies for patients with POAF following cardiac surgery.
Conclusion
Rhythm control does not demonstrate superior outcomes compared to rate control in managing postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery patients.
by Mohammad S. Dairi, Mohammed Tarabzoni, Christopher Tarola, Herman Sehmbi, Hassan Alwafi, Saeed M. Alghamdi, Sariya Khan, Waleed Talal Alotaibi, Ahmed F. Hegazy