Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients: a network meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire

Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients: a network meta-analysis

  • By

  • Xin Yao

  • Ping Jiang

  • Jinfu Zheng

  • Liuzhu Zhang

  • Jun Wang

  • June 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Surgical Approaches for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Older Adults

Overview

This network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of various surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients. Laparoscopic approaches, particularly LR-TEP, demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of reduced bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications compared to open techniques.

Background

As the global population ages, the incidence of inguinal hernias in older adults is increasing, necessitating effective surgical interventions. Elderly patients often present with significant comorbidities, making them high-risk surgical candidates. Understanding the safest and most effective surgical strategies for this demographic is crucial to minimize perioperative risks and improve recovery outcomes.

Data Highlights

TechniqueOutcomeEffect Size (SMD/RR)
LR-TEPBleeding-15.18 (95% CI: -23.45 to -6.90)
LR-TEPHospital Stay-2.30 (95% CI: -3.57 to -1.03)
LR-TAPPBleeding-12.34 (95% CI: -24.27 to -0.41)
OMR-LightweightRecurrence RateRR = 26.16 (95% CI: 1.07–639.67)
OMR-PHSSafety ProfileRR = 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00–0.65)
IPOMPain Relief-2.65 (95% CI: -4.58 to -0.73)

Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic techniques, especially LR-TEP, showed the least bleeding and shortest hospital stays.
  • LR-TEP enabled the earliest ambulation among the surgical techniques evaluated.
  • OMR-Lightweight had a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to other techniques.
  • LR-TEP and LR-TAPP significantly reduced postoperative complications.
  • IPOM provided the greatest pain relief among the techniques assessed.
  • Urinary retention incidence was low across all techniques without significant differences.

Clinical Implications

Minimally invasive surgical options, particularly laparoscopic techniques, should be considered for elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair due to their favorable recovery profiles. Surgeons should weigh the risks and benefits of each technique, especially in patients with significant comorbidities.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that laparoscopic approaches, particularly LR-TEP, are advantageous for elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, offering improved recovery outcomes while maintaining comparable recurrence rates to traditional open techniques.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Hernia, 2026 -- Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: A propensity score–matched analysis of the Herniamed Registry
  2. Hernia, 2025 -- Evaluation of Open Versus Laparoscopic Approaches for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Study
  3. Hernia, 2024 -- Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Geriatric Patients: Insights from Two Comprehensive Medical Centers Over a Decade
  4. Hernia, 2022 -- Is Laparoscopic Repair of Asymptomatic Contralateral Inguinal Hernia Justified in Adults Due to Favorable Benefit-Risk Ratio? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  5. PMC, 2023 -- Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management
  6. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management - PMC
  7. https://felh.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/s10029-025-03368-x.pdf
  8. Frontiers | Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

Original Source(s)

Related Content