Clinical Report: Correction to Phase 1 Base-Editing Trial in HeFH
Overview
A Nature Medicine correction amended baseline apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) values in Table 1 and corrected the presentation of A-to-G editing frequencies in Extended Data Fig. 2d. The correction states that the article’s conclusions, interpretation, results, safety and efficacy assessments, and trial methods were unchanged.
Background
The correction addresses two reporting errors in the phase 1 trial article. During conversion from g/L to mg/dL, a transcription mistake placed the baseline ApoB and ApoA1 entries against the neighboring non-HDL-C and HDL-C rows, respectively. Extended Data Fig. 2d initially showed A-to-G editing frequencies before subtraction of matched untreated-control background, although its legend described background-corrected measurements.
Data Highlights
Measure
Patients 1–6, corrected values
Correction
ApoB (mg/dL)
164, 165, 119, 115, 104, 171
Corrected baseline entries in Table 1
ApoA1 (mg/dL)
159, 174, 117, 157, 140, 192
Corrected baseline entries in Table 1
A-to-G editing frequencies
Net background-corrected values
Extended Data Fig. 2d and associated source data revised
Key Findings
Table 1 was amended to correct baseline ApoB and ApoA1 measurements for Patients 1–6.
The correction attributes the row-placement errors to a transcription mistake during conversion from g/L to mg/dL.
Extended Data Fig. 2d was amended to show A-to-G editing frequencies after subtraction of matched untreated-control background, as described in the figure legend.
The associated source data for Extended Data Fig. 2d were revised in parallel.
The correction states that the article’s conclusions, interpretation, results, and safety and efficacy assessments were unchanged.
The correction states that the underlying sequencing data, off-target evaluation, patient eligibility, trial procedures, dosing, treatment delivery, and statistical analyses were unaffected.
Clinical Implications
The correction revises the baseline ApoB and ApoA1 entries in Table 1 and updates Extended Data Fig. 2d and its associated source data to show background-corrected A-to-G editing frequencies. The correction states that the article’s conclusions, interpretation, results, and safety and efficacy assessments were unchanged.
Conclusion
The correction amended baseline ApoB and ApoA1 measurements in Table 1 and corrected the presentation of A-to-G editing frequencies in Extended Data Fig. 2d. It states that the article’s conclusions, interpretation, results, and safety and efficacy assessments were unchanged.
Advances in biosensors and manufacturing could bring continuous molecular monitoring into routine care, but clinical validation remains a major challenge