Cross-software comparison shows strong agreement for quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in reconstructive surgery - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Cross-software comparison shows strong agreement for quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in reconstructive surgery
Clinical Report: Evaluation of Consistency in Quantitative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography
Overview
This study evaluates the reproducibility of quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (Q-ICG-FA) parameters across two software platforms. Key findings indicate varying levels of agreement for time-to-peak and normalized mean slope inflow, while other parameters showed poor to moderate agreement.
Background
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is increasingly used for intraoperative perfusion assessment in reconstructive surgery. Traditional qualitative assessments are subjective and can lead to variability in clinical outcomes, as noted in previous studies. Quantitative methods aim to provide objective metrics for perfusion evaluation, but consistency across software platforms remains uncertain.
Data Highlights
Parameter
ICC
Agreement
Time-to-Peak (TTP)
0.979
Excellent
Normalized Mean Slope Inflow
0.944
Excellent
T0
Good
Fmax
Good
Absolute Mean Slope Inflow
Good
Normalized Maximum Slope Inflow
0.412
Poor to Moderate
Normalized Maximum Slope Outflow
0.315
Poor to Moderate
Key Findings
Excellent agreement for TTP (ICC = 0.979).
Normalized mean slope inflow showed high agreement (ICC = 0.944).
Good to excellent agreement for T0, Fmax, and absolute mean slope inflow.
Poor to moderate agreement for normalized maximum slopes.