Can Technology Make Pathology More Human? Part 3 - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Can Technology Make Pathology More Human? Part 3

  • By

  • Helen Bristow

  • September 9, 2026

  • 20 min

Share

Clinical Report: Can Technology Make Pathology More Human? Part 3

Overview

Experts discuss the evolving role of AI in pathology, emphasizing the need for trust between technology and pathologists. The conversation highlights the importance of human oversight in AI applications and the gradual integration of AI into pathology workflows, as noted by David West.

Background

The integration of AI into pathology raises critical ethical questions regarding the delegation of tasks traditionally performed by pathologists. As AI technologies advance, understanding the balance between automation and human judgment becomes essential for maintaining diagnostic accuracy and patient trust. This discussion is particularly relevant as the pathology workforce faces increasing demands and potential burnout, as highlighted by Syed T. Hoda.

Data Highlights

No numerical data or trial data was presented in the article.

Key Findings

  • Trust between pathologists and AI systems is crucial for successful integration, as emphasized by David West.
  • Pathologists will continue to hold ultimate responsibility for diagnoses, even with AI assistance, according to David Gibbs.
  • AI technologies should begin with narrowly defined tasks to build confidence before expanding capabilities, as suggested by the experts.
  • Pathologists must determine which tasks can be safely delegated to AI based on sufficient evidence, as stated by Syed T. Hoda.
  • There is a risk of overconfidence in AI as it becomes more widely adopted, as warned by David Gibbs.

Clinical Implications

Pathologists are encouraged to actively participate in the evolution of AI technologies within their field to ensure quality patient care, as discussed by the experts. Maintaining a balance between automation and human oversight is essential for preserving the integrity of pathology diagnoses.

Conclusion

The dialogue surrounding AI in pathology underscores the necessity for careful consideration of human oversight and trust as technology continues to evolve in the field, reflecting the insights shared by the experts.

Related Resources & Content

  1. the pathologist, Can Technology Make Pathology More Human? Part 1, 2026 -- https://www.thepathologist.com/issues/2026/articles/august/can-technology-make-pathology-more-human-part-1/
  2. the pathologist, Can Technology Make Pathology More Human? Part 2, 2026 -- https://www.thepathologist.com/issues/2026/articles/september/can-technology-make-pathology-more-human-part-2/
  3. the pathologist, It’s a People Thing, 2023 -- https://www.thepathologist.com/issues/2023/articles/apr/it-s-a-people-thing/
  4. Guidance for laboratory implementation, governance and continuous assurance of artificial intelligence in histopathology, Virchows Archiv, 2026 -- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00428-026-04684-y
  5. Recommendation Statement for the Validation, Implementation, and Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence Within a Clinical Laboratory, Digital Pathology Association, 2026 -- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2993091X261455975?utm_source=openai
  6. the pathologist — The Pathology of Pathology
  7. Guidance for laboratory implementation, governance and continuous assurance of artificial intelligence in histopathology | Virchows Archiv | Springer Nature Link
  8. Recommendation Statement for the Validation, Implementation, and Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence Within a Clinical Laboratory from the Digital Pathology Association - Nathan Silberman, Anil Parwani, David S. McClintock, Giovanni Lujan, Dibson D. Gondim, Christopher Garcia, Matthew G. Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Jochen K. Lennerz, Timothy Showalter, Paul Gerrard, 2026
  9. Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions | FDA
  10. Central Repository for Digital Pathology | H2020 | CORDIS | European Commission
  11. Real tools. Real standards. Real impact. Bigpicture from data to deployment. | Bigpicture
  12. Nationwide federated learning for histopathology: secure deployment across Germany behind firewalls | npj Digital Medicine
  13. Current CAP Guidelines - CAP
  14. Artificial intelligence-based pathological model for pan-cancer lymph node metastasis detection: a multicentre diagnostic study with retrospective and prospective validation - PubMed
  15. High-sensitivity pan-cancer AI assessment of lymph node metastasis via uncertainty quantification | npj Digital Medicine
  16. Generating dermatopathology reports from gigapixel whole slide images with HistoGPT | Nature Communications
  17. The AI-powered pathologist: A global survey mapping initial trends in AI adoption and outlook - PMC
  18. Annotation Practices in Computational Pathology: A European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) Survey Study - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content