Integrating multimodal prehabilitation into enhanced recovery after surgery programs (MPhERAS) for elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Integrating multimodal prehabilitation into enhanced recovery after surgery programs (MPhERAS) for elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies
Multimodal Prehabilitation in ERAS for Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the integration of multimodal prehabilitation into ERAS protocols for elderly colorectal cancer patients. Results showed a significant improvement in functional capacity measured by the 6-minute walk test, but no significant differences in length of stay, postoperative complications, or quality of life.
Background
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve postoperative outcomes through standardized perioperative care. Multimodal prehabilitation, involving exercise, nutrition, psychological, and spiritual interventions, is proposed to optimize patients' condition before surgery. Elderly patients with colorectal cancer represent a vulnerable population where such interventions could potentially improve recovery. However, the effectiveness of combining multimodal prehabilitation with ERAS in this group remains unclear.
Data Highlights
Outcome
Effect Measure
Result
95% CI
p-value
Heterogeneity (I2)
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Mean Difference (MD)
18.38 m
1.51 to 35.25 m
0.0404
3.7%
Length of Stay (LOS)
Not significant
NS
NS
NS
NS
Postoperative Complications
Not significant
NS
NS
NS
NS
Quality of Life (QOL)
Not significant
NS
NS
NS
NS
Key Findings
Six high-quality studies including 547 elderly colorectal cancer patients were analyzed.
Multimodal prehabilitation significantly improved functional capacity as measured by the 6-minute walk test (MD 18.38 m; p=0.0404).
No statistically significant differences were found in length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, or quality of life.
Low heterogeneity was observed among studies for the 6MWT outcome (I2 = 3.7%).
Subgroup analyses showed no differences based on study design or control group type.
Current evidence suggests limited clinical impact of multimodal prehabilitation within ERAS for this population, though targeted interventions may hold promise.
Clinical Implications
While multimodal prehabilitation can enhance functional capacity preoperatively in elderly colorectal cancer patients, it does not currently demonstrate reductions in hospital stay or postoperative complications when integrated into ERAS protocols. Clinicians should consider individualized prehabilitation strategies and await further research to identify patient subgroups who may benefit most. Implementation should be balanced against resource use and patient preferences.
Conclusion
Multimodal prehabilitation within ERAS protocols modestly improves functional capacity but does not significantly affect other key postoperative outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Further targeted research is needed to optimize and validate these interventions.
References
Incorporating Multimodal Prehabilitation into ERAS Protocols for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis