Pain perception and attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment in pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey of Chinese healthcare professionals - Report - MDSpire

Pain perception and attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment in pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey of Chinese healthcare professionals

  • By

  • Chunyan Yang

  • Meiqi Li

  • Yufei Xue

  • Fangting Wang

  • Wangshan Huang

  • Xiaochen Liu

  • Xiangyue Xiao

  • Xuhang Fan

  • Feng Chen

  • Steven Laureys

  • Haibo Di

  • Siyu Dai

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Attitudes of Chinese Healthcare Professionals on Pain Perception and Life-Sustaining Treatment

Overview

This study explores the attitudes of Chinese healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards pain perception and life-sustaining treatment (LST) in pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC).

Background

Managing pain and life-sustaining treatment for pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness presents unique neuroethical dilemmas. The complexity of medical decision-making in this population is heightened by their inability to communicate and the emotional bonds of family members.

Data Highlights

ContextSupport for LST Limitation
UWS (Third-Person)52.1%
MCS (Third-Person)31.6%
UWS (First-Person)34.0%
MCS (First-Person)18.7%
Pain Perception Endorsement (MCS)89.9%
Pain Perception Endorsement (UWS)65.1%

Key Findings

  • 52.1% of HCPs supported limiting LST for UWS in third-person contexts.
  • Support for LST limitation dropped to 34.0% in first-person scenarios for UWS.
  • High income (>20,000 CNY) was a predictor for LST limitation for UWS in third-person contexts (AOR = 2.87).
  • Nursing and rehabilitation therapists were less likely to continue LST for their own child with UWS (AOR = 0.46 and AOR = 0.55, respectively).
  • Childlessness was associated with a greater willingness to continue LST (AOR = 2.14).
  • 89.9% of HCPs endorsed pain perception for MCS, which significantly reduced willingness to limit LST in UWS cases.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should consider the clinical and ethical dimensions when making decisions regarding LST in pediatric patients with DoC.

Conclusion

Chinese HCPs exhibit caution in limiting LST for pediatric patients with DoC, influenced by various factors including diagnosis and personal perspectives.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2026 -- Current clinical status of perioperative comfort therapy in pediatric anesthesia in China: a national cross-sectional survey
  2. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2026 -- Nurses’ perspectives on pain management in pediatric care: systematic review and meta-synthesis
  3. Intensive Care Medicine, 2007 -- Discussion on “Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals, Patients, and Families in Europe on End-of-Life Choices: Insights from the ETHICATT Research”
  4. Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), 2026 -- Attitudes and Needs of Health Care Providers Toward Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Pediatric Palliative Care: Mixed Methods Study
  5. SCCM 2026 Guideline on the Care and Management of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Patients at the End of Life | SCCM
  6. Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable - PMC
  7. Frontiers | Pain assessment in non-verbal children with neurocognitive impairment: a review on current tools, challenges, and clinical perspectives
  8. SCCM 2026 Guideline on the Care and Management of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Patients at the End of Life | SCCM
  9. Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable - PMC
  10. Frontiers | Pain assessment in non-verbal children with neurocognitive impairment: a review on current tools, challenges, and clinical perspectives

Original Source(s)

Related Content