Psychometric evaluation of the professional forensic stigma scale - Report - MDSpire

Psychometric evaluation of the professional forensic stigma scale

  • By

  • Ellen Vorstenbosch

  • Yvonne H. A. Bouman

  • Gemma Escuder-Romeva

  • Carolina Fellinghauer

  • Erik Bulten

  • Josep Maria Haro

  • July 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Assessment of Psychometric Properties of the Professional Forensic Stigma Scale

Overview

The PROfessional Forensic Stigma (PROFS) scale demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties, including reliability and construct validity, for assessing professional stigma among mental health care professionals working with forensic populations. The refined scale consists of 30 items across three domains: Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination.

Background

Professional stigma in forensic mental healthcare can adversely affect the quality of care and treatment outcomes for service users. The PROFS scale aims to provide a reliable tool for assessing stigma in forensic settings.

Data Highlights

MeasurePSI
Total Scale0.86–0.90
Stereotypes Subscale0.67–0.84

Key Findings

  • The initial PROFS scale had 36 items and was refined to a final version with 30 items.
  • The scale demonstrated a three-domain structure: Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination.
  • Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations with other measures of stigma and emotional reactions.
  • The refined PROFS showed acceptable to good reliability across its total and subscales.
  • Weak associations with empathy and social desirability indicated divergent validity.

Clinical Implications

The PROFS scale can be utilized to identify and measure professional stigma in forensic mental health teams.

Conclusion

The PROFS scale is a tool for assessing professional stigma in forensic mental health settings, with psychometric properties supporting its use in research.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Ellen Vorstenbosch et al., Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2026 -- Psychometric evaluation of the Professional Forensic Stigma (PROFS) scale
  2. Frontiers in Psychiatry — Validation of the CONSULT-PSYCHIATR Scale: reasons for reluctance to seek psychiatric consultation among workers in Peru
  3. BMC Psychiatry (Springer) — Psychometric properties of the German version of the clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) in routine clinical settings: a multi-trait/multi-method study in civilians and military personnel
  4. BMC Psychiatry (Springer) — An Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of CWS in Schizophrenia Patients in China
  5. BMC Psychiatry (Springer) — A psychometric evaluation of the German Revised-Green et al. Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS) in clinical and non-clinical groups
  6. Establishing standards of care for forensic mental health: an international Delphi consensus-building study
  7. Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Quality Network for Forensic Mental Health Services
  8. Mosaic toolkit to end stigma and discrimination in mental health
  9. Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma Among Health Care Professionals in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
  10. Mental health stigma and its consequences: a systematic scoping review of pathways to discrimination and adverse outcomes - PubMed
  11. STANDARDS 2025 ANNUAL REPORT RAISINGTHE
  12. Frontiers | Psychometric evaluation of the Professional Forensic Stigma (PROFS) scale
  13. Conceptualizing Professional Stigma Toward Forensic Mental Health Service Users: Results of a Qualitative Inquiry - Ellen Vorstenbosch, Gemma Escuder-Romeva, Josep Maria Haro, Erik Bulten, 2025
  14. Psychometric properties and validation of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers in Slovenia

Original Source(s)

Related Content