Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the limb function of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire

Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the limb function of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Lisha Xie

  • Nangen Song

  • Cui Huang

  • Yong Fan

  • Youjia Mao

  • Zhicheng Zhu

  • July 3, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Limb Function in Stroke Patients

Overview

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on limb function in stroke patients. The findings indicate significant improvements in specific assessments, particularly the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and Box and Block Test (BBT), while other measures showed no significant effects.

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with many survivors experiencing motor impairments that hinder daily activities. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been investigated as a therapeutic intervention to enhance motor recovery in stroke patients. Understanding the efficacy of TMS is crucial for optimizing rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.

Data Highlights

AssessmentMean Difference (MD)95% Confidence Interval (CI)P-value
ARAT8.010.53–15.500.04
BBT5.360.16–10.560.04
FMA-UL--P > 0.88
FMA-LL--P > 0.88
MAS--P > 0.88
WMFT--P > 0.88

Key Findings

  • TMS significantly improved scores on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) with a mean difference of 8.01.
  • Improvements were also noted in the Box and Block Test (BBT) with a mean difference of 5.36.
  • No significant effects were observed for Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Limb (FMA-UL), Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Limb (FMA-LL), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT).
  • Subgroup analysis indicated that intervention cycles longer than 2 weeks improved FMA scores.
  • The study included a total of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the meta-analysis.
  • Further large-scale RCTs are necessary to confirm the findings due to the limited sample size.

Clinical Implications

The findings suggest that TMS may be beneficial for improving upper limb function in stroke patients, particularly in enhancing flexibility and motion. Clinicians should consider the duration of TMS interventions when designing rehabilitation programs.

Conclusion

Further research is needed to validate the effects of TMS on limb function in stroke patients.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Neurology, 2026 -- Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: an overview of systematic reviews
  2. Frontiers in Neurology, 2026 -- Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with functional near-infrared spectroscopy to elucidate the neurophysiological mechanisms of post-stroke hemiplegia: a systematic review
  3. Frontiers in Neurology, 2026 -- Comparing the effects of different electromagnetic stimulation on lower limb motor impairment after stroke: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
  4. Frontiers in Neurology, 2026 -- Effects of Non-Invasive Neural Stimulation Modalities on Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  5. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Stroke Rehabilitation, 2024
  6. Effects of Navigated rTMS on Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials - PMC
  7. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Stroke Rehabilitation
  8. Effects of Navigated rTMS on Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content