Integrative Oncology Models of Care: Practice Patterns From NCCN Member Institutions - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Integrative Oncology Models of Care: Practice Patterns From NCCN Member Institutions
Patients with cancer frequently incorporate complementary modalities into their care. A survey of 29 NCCN Member Institutions revealed details on how integrative oncology services are delivered, including the types of services provided, referral process, employment structure, and role of advanced practice providers.
Clinical Report: Integrative Oncology Models of Care from NCCN Institutions
Overview
This report highlights the practice patterns of integrative oncology (IO) services across NCCN Member Institutions, revealing that 100% of responding centers offer IO services. The survey identified significant variations in service types, funding structures, and access methods among institutions.
Background
Integrative oncology combines conventional cancer treatments with evidence-based complementary therapies, addressing the needs of over 77% of cancer patients who utilize such practices. The NCCN aims to enhance cancer care quality and accessibility, making it crucial to understand how IO services are structured and delivered across institutions.
Data Highlights
Service Type
Percentage Offered
Nutritional and Dietary Services
97%
Stress and Anxiety Management
76%
Mind-Body Practices
72%
Physical and Occupational Therapy
72%
Acupuncture/Acupressure
69%
Massage Therapy
59%
Key Findings
100% of responding NCCN Member Institutions offer integrative oncology services.
97% provide nutritional and dietary services, while 76% offer stress and anxiety management.
Other services include mind-body practices (72%), physical and occupational therapy (72%), and acupuncture/acupressure (69%).
Funding for IO therapies varies significantly among institutions, impacting service delivery.
45% of centers reported offering additional services such as art therapy and yoga.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare providers should consider integrating evidence-based complementary therapies into cancer care to enhance patient outcomes. Understanding the variability in IO service delivery can help institutions develop more effective and accessible integrative oncology programs.
Conclusion
The findings underscore the importance of standardized yet flexible integrative oncology models to meet diverse patient needs and improve overall cancer care delivery.
by Angela F. Bazzell, Lydia T. Madsen, Lindsey Bandini, Terry Harrington, Jonathan Siman, Charlene E. Stein, Heather Greenlee, Jason B. Fleming, Alexandra Huffman
