Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Scheduled Temporary Withdrawal Versus Ongoing Maintenance of Interleukin Inhibitors in Psoriasis Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis - Report - MDSpire

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Scheduled Temporary Withdrawal Versus Ongoing Maintenance of Interleukin Inhibitors in Psoriasis Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

  • By

  • Rodrigo R. de Sena

  • Kleyton de C Mesquita

  • Letícia F. Barroso

  • Paola B. E. Canabrava

  • Fernando Zanghelini

  • Ciro M. Gomes

  • March 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluation of Withdrawal Versus Maintenance of IL Inhibitors in Psoriasis

Overview

This systematic review and network meta-analysis indicates that planned withdrawal of anti-interleukin therapy in psoriasis patients generally leads to inferior remission maintenance compared to ongoing therapy, without a reduction in adverse event rates. Notably, bimekizumab and guselkumab demonstrated superior outcomes for PASI 90 endpoints upon withdrawal.

Background

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated condition affecting 2-3% of the global population, with biologics becoming the standard treatment. The decision to withdraw biologic therapy raises concerns about relapse and the need for updated clinical guidance, particularly for patients requiring temporary cessation for reasons such as live vaccinations or pregnancy.

Data Highlights

No new numerical data was presented in the article.

Key Findings

  • Planned withdrawal of anti-IL therapy is associated with inferior remission maintenance compared to continuous therapy.
  • No reduction in adverse event rates was observed with withdrawal.
  • Bimekizumab and guselkumab showed superior PASI 90 outcomes compared to other anti-IL therapies.
  • Key considerations for withdrawal include drug half-life, timing of relapse, and patient-specific factors.
  • Structured clinical pathways are essential for managing biologic therapy interruptions.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should carefully assess the risks of planned withdrawal of anti-IL therapies in psoriasis patients, as it may lead to relapse without reducing adverse events. Continuous maintenance therapy is generally recommended to ensure sustained remission.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the importance of ongoing maintenance therapy for psoriasis patients on anti-IL biologics, particularly in the context of planned withdrawals for clinical reasons.

References

  1. Discontinuation of TNF antagonists is not recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  2. Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of interleukin-17A inhibitors for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  3. Efficacy and Safety of IL-23 Inhibitors for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
  4. Safety Profile of Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Crohn’s Disease: A Comprehensive Review of Phase II/III Clinical Trials
  5. Living EuroGuiDerm Guideline for the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris | EDFG
  6. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial
  7. Comparison of the Effects and Safety of Planned Limited-Time Withdrawal Versus Continuous Maintenance of Interleukin Inhibitors in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
  8. Living EuroGuiDerm Guideline for the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris
  9. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial - PubMed
  10. Comparison of the Effects and Safety of Planned Limited-Time Withdrawal Versus Continuous Maintenance of Interleukin Inhibitors in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content