Real-world comparison of anti-CD20 therapies: efficacy, infections, and immune profiles in a German cohort - Report - MDSpire

Real-world comparison of anti-CD20 therapies: efficacy, infections, and immune profiles in a German cohort

  • By

  • Jakob Stögbauer

  • Moritz Bewarder

  • Linda Groß

  • Lorenz Thurner

  • Klaus Fassbender

  • Rebecca Urschel

  • Einar A. Høgestøl

  • Gro O. Nygaard

  • Hanne F. Harbo

  • Olaf Stüve

  • Marc Pawlitzki

  • Sven G. Meuth

  • Martina Sester

  • Sergiu Groppa

  • Mathias Fousse

  • May 12, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Comparative Analysis of Anti-CD20 Treatments in Germany

Overview

This study evaluates the effectiveness, infection rates, and immune responses of anti-CD20 treatments in a cohort of 262 patients with neuroimmunological diseases. Key findings indicate low annual relapse rates for ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, with significant differences in infection rates and hypogammaglobulinemia occurrence among treatments.

Background

Anti-CD20 therapies have become crucial in managing neuroimmunological diseases, particularly multiple sclerosis. Understanding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of these treatments is essential for optimizing patient care and minimizing adverse effects. This analysis addresses the gap in direct comparative studies of B-cell-depleting agents.

Data Highlights

Verify and adjust the interpretation of infection rates to align with the source.

Key Findings

  • Annual relapse rates were low for both ocrelizumab (0.11) and ofatumumab (0.08).
  • Ofatumumab was associated with significantly lower infection rates compared to other treatments (p < 0.001).
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia occurred more frequently and earlier in patients treated with rituximab (p < 0.001).
  • Ocrelizumab treatment led to a reduction in total lymphocytes and an increase in CD3+ T cells.
  • Ofatumumab treatment was linked to an increased CD4/CD8 ratio.
  • Anti-CD20 antibodies did not affect T-cell reactivity after polyclonal stimulation.

Clinical Implications

The findings suggest that while all anti-CD20 therapies are effective in reducing relapses in neuroimmunological diseases, clinicians should consider the differing infection rates and immune response profiles when selecting a treatment. Individualized treatment strategies may enhance patient outcomes and minimize risks.

Conclusion

This comparative analysis underscores the effectiveness of B-cell depletion in neuroimmunological diseases while highlighting significant differences in safety profiles among anti-CD20 therapies. Further research is warranted to refine treatment strategies.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2023 -- Highlights from the 49th Annual Conference of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
  2. Impact of Crohn’s Disease on Patient Health, 2023 -- Findings from a Major German Health Insurance Study
  3. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2023 -- Infectious Risks Associated with CD30-targeted CAR T-cell Therapy in Adult Patients
  4. The ASCO Post, 2018 -- Responses Reported With CAR T-Cell Therapy in High-Risk NHL
  5. German S2k Guidelines, 2026 -- Diagnosis and Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis
  6. Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis - PubMed
  7. Frontiers, 2024 -- Hypogammaglobulinemia and infections in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with anti-CD20 treatments
  8. https://register.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/030-050l_S2k_Diagnose-Therapie-Multiple-Sklerose-Neuromyelitis-optica-Spektrum-Erkrankung-NMOSD-MOG-IgG-assoziierte-Erkrankung-MOGAD_2026-04.pdf
  9. Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis - PubMed
  10. Frontiers | Hypogammaglobulinemia and infections in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with anti-CD20 treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,139 multiple sclerosis patients

Original Source(s)

Related Content