New insights from MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for refractory epilepsy: a state-of-the-art overview - Report - MDSpire

New insights from MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for refractory epilepsy: a state-of-the-art overview

  • By

  • Carlos Quispe-Vicuña

  • Fernando Terry

  • Miguel Cabanillas-Lazo

  • Alejandro Enríquez-Marulanda

  • Niels Pacheco-Barrios

  • Forough Yazdanian

  • J. Pierre Zila-Velasque

  • David R. Soriano-Moreno

  • Christian Moran-Mariños

  • Evan Luther

  • Lekhaj Daggubati

  • Martin Merenzon

  • Jaime Lopez-Calle

  • Jorge G. Burneo

  • Ricardo J. Komotar

  • Ziev B. Moses

  • John D. Rolston

  • Carlos Alva-Diaz

  • May 29, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Advancements in MRI-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Overview

This comprehensive review evaluates the application of MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), highlighting a seizure freedom rate between 18.87% and 75.86%. The review underscores the critical lack of standardized clinical guidelines and the very low certainty of evidence due to the absence of randomized studies.

Background

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects approximately 30%–40% of epilepsy patients, necessitating effective treatment options. Surgical interventions, particularly MRgLITT, have emerged as promising alternatives, yet the lack of standardized guidelines presents challenges in clinical application. Understanding the efficacy and safety of MRgLITT is crucial for improving patient outcomes in DRE.

Data Highlights

OutcomeRate
Seizure Freedom Rate18.87% - 75.86%
Visual Field Deficit Complications2.17% - 7.5%
Intracranial Hemorrhage Complications0.96% - 8.6%

Key Findings

  • Seizure freedom rates for MRgLITT range from 18.87% to 75.86%.
  • Fourteen systematic reviews scored “Critically low” on the AMSTAR-2 tool.
  • The most common complications include visual field deficits (2.17%–7.5%) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.96%–8.6%).
  • All outcomes reported a “very low” certainty of evidence due to the absence of randomized studies.
  • The primary outcomes assessed were seizure freedom and perioperative complications rates.

Clinical Implications

The findings indicate a need for further research to establish definitive conclusions regarding MRgLITT for DRE. Clinicians should be aware of the variability in outcomes and the potential complications associated with this therapy.

Conclusion

This review highlights the promising yet uncertain role of MRgLITT in treating DRE, emphasizing the necessity for more robust studies to clarify its efficacy and safety.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. phoenix children's medical connection, Innovative, Minimally Invasive Treatment for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
  5. NICE, Guidance, 2026 -- MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy
  6. Author(s)/Org, JAMA Neurology, 2025 -- Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
  7. Author(s)/Org, PubMed, 2024 -- Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus open surgical corpus callosotomy for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  8. 1 Recommendations | MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy | Guidance | NICE
  9. Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
  10. Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus open surgical corpus callosotomy for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content