Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials - Report - MDSpire

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

  • By

  • Yibang Ye

  • Liangyu Zhang

  • Zhenyuan Yang

  • Yizhou Huang

  • Maohui Chen

  • Shuliang Zhang

  • Taidui Zeng

  • Chun Chen

  • Bin Zheng

  • July 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy in ESCC

Overview

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NIC) compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). NIC significantly improved major and pathological complete response rates, along with other perioperative benefits.

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor long-term prognosis, particularly in East Asia. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard treatment to enhance resectability, but its effectiveness has been limited. The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors into neoadjuvant treatment strategies has emerged as a promising approach to improve patient outcomes.

Data Highlights

OutcomeNICNCOdds Ratio (OR) / Hazard Ratio (HR)p-value
Major Pathological Response (MPR)42.8%22.2%2.400.0007
Pathological Complete Response (pCR)22.2%8.0%3.53<0.00001
Overall Survival (OS)--HR = 0.570.05
R0 Resection Rate--2.560.05
Surgical Rate--1.570.02
Immune-related Adverse Events (iRAEs)23.21%1.16%-<0.00001

Key Findings

  • NIC significantly improved major pathological response (42.8% vs. 22.2%, OR = 2.40, p = 0.0007).
  • NIC also led to a higher pathological complete response rate (22.2% vs. 8.0%, OR = 3.53, p < 0.00001).
  • There was a borderline statistically significant improvement in overall survival with NIC (HR = 0.57, p = 0.05).
  • NIC enhanced the surgical rate (OR = 1.57, p = 0.02) and R0 resection rate (OR = 2.56, p = 0.05).
  • Immune-related adverse events were significantly higher in the NIC group (23.21% vs. 1.16%, p < 0.00001).

Clinical Implications

The findings indicate that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may provide significant benefits in terms of pathological responses and surgical outcomes for patients with resectable ESCC.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy demonstrates improved pathological responses and surgical outcomes in resectable ESCC compared to traditional chemotherapy.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. conexiant — Chemoimmunotherapy Linked to HNSCC Response
  6. Frontiers in Immunology — Sequential versus concurrent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial (HCHTOG1906)
  7. SEOM–GEMCAD–TTD clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer (update 2025) - PMC
  8. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without camrelizumab in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-NEO/NCCES01 trial | Nature Medicine
  9. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on four randomized controlled trials

Original Source(s)

Related Content