Warm sitz bath as an adjunctive therapy for distal ureteral calculi ≤5 mm: a prospective study - Report - MDSpire

Warm sitz bath as an adjunctive therapy for distal ureteral calculi ≤5 mm: a prospective study

  • By

  • Li-diao Li

  • Jing-jing Lou

  • Ze-peng Wu

  • Xiang Hu

  • Hai-ou Lv

  • Yu-han He

  • July 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Efficacy of Warm Sitz Baths for Distal Ureteral Stones

Overview

This study evaluates the efficacy of warm sitz baths (WSB) as an adjunctive treatment for patients with distal ureteral stones ≤5 mm. Results indicate that WSB significantly shortens stone expulsion time and reduces pain episodes compared to a control group.

Background

Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition that poses a significant public health challenge, with a high incidence of renal colic and associated complications. Distal ureteral stones <5 mm have a high likelihood of spontaneous passage, yet patients often endure discomfort and pain during this period. Non-pharmacological interventions like warm sitz baths may provide symptomatic relief.

Data Highlights

ParameterWSB GroupControl GroupP-value
Stone Expulsion Time (days)9.3 ± 2.914.3 ± 4.2< 0.001
Stone Expulsion Rate at Week 140.7%21.0%0.019
Stone Expulsion Rate at Week 281.4%61.3%0.015
4-week Stone Expulsion Rate93.2%87.1%0.260
Daily Pain Episodes0.8 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.4< 0.001
Post-treatment VAS Score3.1 ± 1.04.2 ± 1.7< 0.001
Analgesic Requirements4.1 ± 1.58.4 ± 3.1< 0.001

Key Findings

  • WSB significantly reduced stone expulsion time compared to the control group (9.3 vs. 14.3 days, P < 0.001).
  • Higher stone expulsion rates were observed in the WSB group at week 1 (40.7% vs. 21.0%, P = 0.019) and week 2 (81.4% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.015).
  • No significant difference in the 4-week stone expulsion rate between groups (93.2% vs. 87.1%, P = 0.260).
  • WSB group reported fewer daily pain episodes (0.8 vs. 1.3, P < 0.001) and lower post-treatment VAS scores (3.1 vs. 4.2, P < 0.001).
  • Analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the WSB group (4.1 vs. 8.4, P < 0.001).
  • No significant differences in adverse events between the two groups.

Clinical Implications

The study results suggest that warm sitz baths may reduce stone expulsion time and pain episodes in patients with distal ureteral stones ≤5 mm.

Conclusion

Warm sitz baths may shorten expulsion time and alleviate pain for patients with distal ureteral stones ≤5 mm, though they do not significantly affect overall stone expulsion rates at 4 weeks.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2025
  6. New stone guidelines sharpen focus on patient-centered care | AUA
  7. Which combination of medical expulsive therapy is more effective for treatment of distal ureteral stone in adults? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
  8. Pain management - NCBI Bookshelf
  9. An effective treatment option for pain caused by urolithiasis: A randomised‐controlled trial of local active warming with heat‐patch
  10. https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-2025.pdf
  11. New stone guidelines sharpen focus on patient-centered care | AUA
  12. Which combination of medical expulsive therapy is more effective for treatment of distal ureteral stone in adults? A systematic review and network meta-analysis | BMC Urology | Springer Nature Link
  13. Pain management - NCBI Bookshelf
  14. An effective treatment option for pain caused by urolithiasis: A randomised‐controlled trial of local active warming with heat‐patch - Mutlu - 2021 - International Journal of Clinical Practice - Wiley Online Library

Original Source(s)

Related Content