Correction: Variations in Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events by Gender in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Correction: Variations in Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events by Gender in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

  • By

  • Cuimei Guo

  • Nan Lin

  • Ailin Cao

  • Chaoxin Han

  • Qifeng Jin

  • Yan Liu

  • Xinxin Bian

  • Fengyi Shan

  • Zhongxu Sun

  • Shaohui Zhang

  • Xueying Chen

  • December 22, 2025

Share

Correction: Variations in Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid by Gender

Overview

This correction addresses the predictive value of serum uric acid (SUA) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, highlighting gender differences. The corrected figures provide clarity on the data presented in the original study.

Background

Understanding the role of SUA in predicting cardiovascular outcomes is crucial, especially given the high morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular diseases. Recent studies have indicated that SUA levels may correlate with adverse cardiovascular events, yet guidelines have not standardized its use in risk stratification for ACS. This topic is particularly relevant as it may influence clinical decision-making and patient management strategies.

Data Highlights

No numerical or trial data is presented in this correction.

Key Findings

  • The correction addresses inaccuracies in the figures presented in the original publication.
  • Gender differences in the predictive value of SUA for MACE were emphasized.
  • Recent literature suggests a link between hyperuricemia and increased cardiovascular risk.
  • Major guidelines currently do not include SUA as a standard biomarker in ACS management.
  • Ongoing research continues to explore the implications of SUA in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should be aware of the evolving evidence regarding SUA and its potential role in cardiovascular risk assessment, particularly in ACS patients. While SUA is not currently a standard biomarker in guidelines, its association with adverse outcomes warrants further investigation and consideration in clinical practice.

Conclusion

The correction highlights the importance of accurate data representation in research on SUA and cardiovascular events. Continued exploration of SUA's role may enhance risk stratification and management in ACS.

Related Resources & Content

  1. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2025 -- Correction: Variations in Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events by Gender in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
  2. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2024 -- Examining the Link Between Gout and Future Cardiovascular Events
  3. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2021 -- Incorporating Uric Acid into Metabolic Syndrome Criteria
  4. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2025 -- Association of Triglyceride-Glucose Index with Mortality Risk
  5. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes - American College of Cardiology
  6. Clinical Rheumatology — Utilizing Machine Learning to Assess the Impact of Systemic Inflammation Response Index on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Gout: A Retrospective Analysis and Clinical Validation
  7. ACC Guidelines on Acute Coronary Syndromes
  8. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine - Systematic Review on SUA
  9. Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hyperuricemia and high cardiovascular risk: 2025 update - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content