Effectiveness and safety of switching biologics after secukinumab treatment failure in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study - Report - MDSpire

Effectiveness and safety of switching biologics after secukinumab treatment failure in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Zhongyu Zhang

  • Bin Zhang

  • Yating Wen

  • Qian Hu

  • Wenjun Jiang

  • Jia Zhuo

  • Guangying Luo

  • Yuyi Wang

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Switching Biologics

Overview

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of switching to ixekizumab, guselkumab, or ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who failed secukinumab therapy.

Background

Biologic switching is a common practice for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who do not respond to secukinumab.

Data Highlights

BiologicPASI 75 Response Rate at Week 12Adverse Event Rate
Ixekizumab66.7%28.6%
Guselkumab28.1%12.5%
Ustekinumab16.7%33.3%

Key Findings

  • Ixekizumab had a PASI 75 response rate of 66.7% at week 12, significantly higher than guselkumab (28.1%) and ustekinumab (16.7%) (P = 0.010).
  • In the secondary failure subgroup, ixekizumab showed a numerical advantage in PASI 75 response at all time points.
  • No significant differences in adverse event rates were observed among the three biologics (P = 0.281).
  • All adverse events reported were mild and did not lead to treatment discontinuation.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider ixekizumab as a potentially more effective option for patients with secondary failure after secukinumab. The safety profiles of ixekizumab, guselkumab, and ustekinumab are favorable, allowing for flexibility in treatment decisions based on individual patient circumstances.

Conclusion

Switching to ixekizumab may provide better short- to mid-term effectiveness for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who fail secukinumab, especially in cases of secondary failure. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Drugs - Real World Outcomes, 2024 -- Evaluation of Ixekizumab's Effectiveness in Psoriasis Patients Transitioning from IL-23 Inhibitors and Other Biologics
  2. Drugs - Real World Outcomes, 2020 -- Analysis of Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization Patterns Related to Biologic Treatments in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients
  3. Clinical Rheumatology, 2021 -- Factors Influencing Treatment Switches in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients
  4. Dermatology and Therapy, 2026 -- Immunobiological Therapy in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
  5. S3 Guideline for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm, 2026
  6. Differential Pharmacodynamic Effects on Psoriatic Biomarkers by Guselkumab Versus Secukinumab, 2024
  7. Six-Month Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Ixekizumab, 2024
  8. S3 Guideline for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm – part 1: Treatment recommendations and monitoring - PMC
  9. Differential Pharmacodynamic Effects on Psoriatic Biomarkers by Guselkumab Versus Secukinumab Correlate with Long-Term Efficacy: An ECLIPSE Substudy - PMC
  10. Six-Month Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Ixekizumab After Switching from IL-23 Inhibitors and Other Biologic Therapies: The CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content